the oh-no! DVD of the week: ‘G Fight: The Best of Women’s Mixed Martial Arts’

It’s like Girls Gone Wild, except they can kill you:

With the popularity of Gina Carano, women’s MMA has grown increasingly stronger over the last two years. HOOKnSHOOT, the second longest running MMA show next to the UFC, has been the biggest proponent for female fighting. HnS established an entire division strictly for women’s fighting. GFIGHT was formed in 2006 and delivers the best damn women in the fighting industry. Modern day gladiatrix do batter in the purest and most ultimate form of fighting.

“Do batter”? Does the copywriter mean “do battle”? Or is this some sort of women-belong-in-the-kitchen-making-pancakes humor?

share and enjoy
               
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
subscribe
notify of
10 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
bitchen frizzy
bitchen frizzy
Tue, Oct 06, 2009 10:13am

Why is this an “oh-no!” video?

bracyman
bracyman
Tue, Oct 06, 2009 10:36am

More of an “oh no!” pull quote.

I’d disagree with the Girls Gone Wild comparison. It’s not like the girls are drunk or high when they’re fighting. Aside from the (hopefully) spell-check induced error, the rest of that description isn’t even remotely insulting.

Hmm, I reread it just to be sure and I take that last sentence back. Clearly the person writing it had only peripheral connections to the English language. How can something be the most ultimate? Increasingly stronger? I understand that advertisement means making things seem bigger and better, but couldn’t they have used exclamation points instead?

Jurgan
Jurgan
Tue, Oct 06, 2009 3:37pm

“gladiatrix”

Seriously?

(And, since it’s plural, wouldn’t it be gladiatrices?”

Victor Plenty
Victor Plenty
Wed, Oct 07, 2009 7:36pm

Gladiatrixi.

(I’m nearly certain that plural is horribly incorrect Latin grammar, but I don’t care.)

noq
noq
Thu, Oct 08, 2009 2:21pm

Megumi Fujii makes pancakes and breaks ankles.

Well, mostly breaks ankles.

Paul
Paul
Thu, Oct 08, 2009 6:32pm

I’m a little torn, because the traditionalist in me wants them to be wearing martial arts uniforms, but at the same time the male mixed martialists are also dressed more like boxers than martial artists. And look, ooo, abs of steel.

Yeah, I’d say the problem with this ad is the abuse of English, not of women. If they themselves noticed, they probably figure their main demographic for watching mixed martial arts wouldn’t. But now I’m getting flashbacks; if they’d had women’s mixed MA fights back when I was in college, my g/f probably would have signed up.

Jurgan
Jurgan
Fri, Oct 09, 2009 7:09am

Well, matrix is pluralized as matrices, so dominatrix would be dominatrices, and gladiatrix would be gladiatrices. Of course, the latter isn’t even a word.

bitchen frizzy
bitchen frizzy
Fri, Oct 09, 2009 10:49am

I’m just being a quibbling nitpicker, I know, but I can’t resist.

According to the online Merriam Webster dictionary, “gladiatrices” is the valid plural of “gladiatrix,” which is a word – borrowed directly from Latin – meaning “female gladiator.”

Grinebiter
Grinebiter
Fri, Oct 09, 2009 11:41am

I agree that “most ultimate” is bad English, but even if it weren’t, I should still wonder why exactly mixed female martial arts should be more ultimate than any other kind. Because men, or unmixed women, don’t fight to the death, whereas these do? The same applies to “purer”; after all, pure generally means unmixed, so all-women MA should logically be purer than MMA.

Paul
Paul
Fri, Oct 09, 2009 5:38pm

Grinebiter: the “mixed” refers to being allowed to use any martial art, not it being co-ed. I don’t watch a lot of MMA shows on my own, but I had friends in a kung fu club who did, and watching them (and the show) was interesting.

In the early days, a guy named Tank Abbot made it all the way to the final round on sheer aggression. His training method was to go bars and pick fights; he was built like a sumo wrestler. He bulled his way through all the hard style fighters (punching and kicking arts) until a judo guy pinned him. In another tournament, a weight lifter who took six months of jujitsu fought his way to the quarter finals. I found those examples humbling as a martial artist. And 2/3 of the fights were won by grappling moves, only 1/3 by knock out. So these days all the MMA fighters are more muscled and study both striking and grappling. That’s evolution for you.