damn those high-society film critics, anyway

Does everyone entertain such misconceptions about film critics as Jamie Dexter at TheLeafChronicle.com? His defense of the remake of A Nightmare on Elm Street is headlined:

Don’t heed the high-paid critics, ‘Nightmare’ is terrifyingly good

And then it goes on:

If it’s a remake or a horror film, critics are going to hate it.

And by critics, I mean the high-paid guys/gals who get to see films with the rest of high-society and aren’t experiencing the joy of real people reacting to a film.

This explains so much: I am high society and not a real person. I feel real, but that must be an illusion. And now I understand why there’s always cucumber sandwiches at press screenings. That never made any sense to me before. I’ve always politely taken a linen napkin to rest across my lap during the movie, but I’ve never had the nerve to ask about the finger bowls. My bad.

share and enjoy
               
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
subscribe
notify of
9 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
A.J. Hakari
Fri, May 07, 2010 6:47pm

Well, I saw this with a “real” audience, and I can’t tell what I hated more: the film itself or the twelve dozen cell phones whipped open during the film.

I could’ve been served filet mignon during “Elm Street,” and it wouldn’t change the fact that it was not only a remake that brought zero innovation or substantial change to the table but one that wasn’t even aesthetically pleasing.

Wake me when horror movies stop trying to hide themselves and actually let me see what I’m supposed to be scared of.

A.J. Hakari
Fri, May 07, 2010 6:49pm

Ah, and as one of those high-fallutin’ critics, I suppose thinking “Daybreakers” was a pretty boss flick carries no salt with Dexter.

Drave
Drave
Fri, May 07, 2010 6:53pm

Imagine if these people found out about the secret screening rooms on the moon, and the complimentary chocolate and diamonds they hand out as you come in!

mortadella
mortadella
Fri, May 07, 2010 8:04pm

Why does Dexter get to be a really real person?
*Sniff* I wanna be real too!

Knightgee
Knightgee
Fri, May 07, 2010 8:17pm

High-paid…film critics? Wha…?

MaryAnn, are you secretly rich and just not telling us?

MaryAnn
MaryAnn
Fri, May 07, 2010 9:19pm

Why does Dexter get to be a really real person?

He wished very hard, and Geppetto made him a real boy.

MaryAnn
MaryAnn
Fri, May 07, 2010 9:20pm

MaryAnn, are you secretly rich and just not telling us?

I am! Those screening rooms on the moon: I own them.

Paul
Sat, May 08, 2010 5:36pm

Well, it’s one of those self-fullfilling prophesies, you see. If you convince people to stop reading critics because they are elites, then critics will lose audience, and then critizism will be so poorly paid that only rich people will be able to be critics.

Orangutan
Orangutan
Sat, May 08, 2010 6:49pm

He wished very hard, and Geppetto made him a real boy.

COMPLETELY unrelated to the topic at hand, but if you find yourself with some spare reading time, I really recommend you pick up the Vertigo series ‘Fables’. You’ll get a whole different view of Pinocchio. :)

http://www.amazon.com/Fables-Vol-1-Legends-Exile/dp/1563899426/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1273358878&sr=8-1