your £$ support needed

part of a small rebellion | by maryann johanson

‘Doctor Who’ conundrum: Does the ending of “The Almost People” negate the rest of it?

Don’t read this until you’ve seen “The Almost People.” I’m so not kidding.

We’ve had a few days to think about “The Almost People” now — read my blogging on the episode and the interesting discussion in comments following here — and one thing continues to haunt me. One thing bothers me no matter how I turn it over, no matter how many sides I look at it from.

Here’s the thing: I cannot see how the Doctor does not commit murder at the end of the epiode, when he destroys the Flesh Amy.
The entirety of the previous 90 minutes — encompassing as well, of course, “The Rebel Flesh” — are about the Doctor establishing that the Flesh is a living being, “sacred life,” a “miracle,” independent consciousness apart from the human minds that drive around the Flesh bodies. He makes a connection with the Flesh when he puts his hand in the tank — this is Flesh that is not being used by any human consciousness at the time. Both the real Doctor (if he is real and not also Flesh) and the Flesh copy we see created in this episode experience a psychic connection to the discarded Flesh as it asks Why? it has been treated so well. And if there were any doubt that what the Doctor(s) experience is real, there is also the matter of the discarded Flesh bodies that Jennifer shows Rory: we see that even when severed from their human drivers, the Flesh remains conscious and suffering.

So, Flesh Amy is being “driven” by real Amy, from her place of captivity, and it may well be that the only way to sever that connection is to destroy the Flesh Amy. But perhaps not. We’ve seen the Doctor, in other instances, go to extraordinary lengths to avoid doing violence to sentient beings, yet he doesn’t try that here. There doesn’t appear to have been any urgent reason for the Doctor to have destroyed Flesh Amy and severed that connection at this very moment: indeed, it may have been kinder to real Amy to let her continue to remain ignorant of her predicament. Why not continue to let Flesh Amy walk around, even help rescue herself? Perhaps the time might have come when the Doctor, having run out of all other options, would have no choice but to destroy Flesh Amy.

And yet, even then, wouldn’t he agonize over it? Why is he so cavalier about destroying Flesh Amy, particularly after he had himself experienced their pain?

The Doctor seems disappointed in Amy/Flesh Amy after she renders the decision that the Flesh copies are not as worthy of life/respect/love as the real people they’re based on. It almost seems as if the Doctor is punishing Amy/Flesh Amy for that attitude… but that sort of vindictiveness is not like the Doctor at all. Not even the Doctor who has told us, point blank, that he used to have so much mercy but doesn’t anymore. Not even the Doctor who has reminded us he’s so much older and so much less forgiving than he once was.

Now, I’m not entirely convinced that the Doctor who was presented to us as the real one in this episode isn’t himself a Flesh copy — for one thing, I don’t see where there would have been time for the two Doctors to switch shoes, as they claim to have done, which would mean that it is indeed the Doctor who is meant to be real whom we see dissolve into Flesh at the end of “The Almost People.” Which would mean the Doctor now on the TARDIS, the one who destroys Flesh Amy, is himself Flesh. If this were the case, he would have to be Flesh created by a future version of the technology than we’ve seen here, because he made multiple references to the fact that he’s here to check out the early stages of the Flesh. It could well be that a more advanced Flesh Doctor holds less advanced Flesh in some sort of contempt, irrespective of the fact that it is sentient and in pain. I don’t know yet what would account for that, but right now, it seems like the “best” explanation — if still a very disturbing one — for the Doctor’s behavior here.

Or am I missing something?

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/flick/public_html/wptest/wp-content/themes/FlickFilosopher/loop-single.php on line 106
posted in:
tv buzz

  • Crhis!

    I know I’m very late coming in here, I’ve just been reading all your episode blogs over the last few days. And while you are a complete mental case whose obsession with this TV programme is anything but healthy, you have some very insightful things to offer!

    In this case though I think the flesh that the Doctor destroys at the end of the episode was not really sentient as it was still being controlled, I think it’s only when the flesh breaks from its operator that it properly becomes sentient. And he didn’t necessarily “kill” the flesh itself, he just stopped it taking the shape of Amy. Just my thoughts, does it make any sense?!

  • Christopher Holt

    I just rewatched these 2 episodes and I realize now that I see that the Doctor did the right thing. When Flesh Doctor told Flesh Amy to push but only when she tells you that’s a clue that Flesh Doctor knew she wasn’t like him. If she had been real Flesh Doctor would have told the real Doctor. Then afterwards the real Doctor nodded and knew Flesh Amy wasn’t a separate being. It was being controlled by Amy who was about to give birth. So the Doctor didn’t kill anyone. It was just an avatar.

  • Christopher Holt

    In my viewpoint the question is moot. The Doctor made sure that Flesh Amy was just an avatar because he was watching Flesh Doctor to tell Amy to “push but only when she tells you too” then the Doctor observed this and nodded. He made sure she was sentient Flesh. Flesh Doctor certainly would have known this and told the Doctor. Both Doctors were there to make the evaluation. She was just and avatar. Confirmed by both Doctors. I hadn’t noticed this until I saw it about 3 times. Everyone should rematch these episodes to fully understand it because I needed to watch them again. I’m glad I enlightened myself.

Pin It on Pinterest