BASIC REPRESENTATION SCORE: +25
FEMALE AGENCY/POWER/AUTHORITY SCORE: +1
THE MALE GAZE SCORE: -40
GENDER/SEXUALITY SCORE: -10
WILDCARD SCORE: -10
Is there anything either positive or negative in the film’s representation of women not already accounted for here? (points will vary)
The film presents as romantic and desirable a man who polices a woman’s food and drink, is unreasonably jealous, stalks, and engages in other controlling and abusive actions. There is absolutely no criticism of his behavior in either the text or the subtext; to the contrary, his behavior is depicted as an appropriately masculine and sexy way to treat a woman, behavior that she secretly desires and for which she will reward him with sex.
TOTAL SCORE: -24
IS THE FILM’S DIRECTOR FEMALE? Yes (Sam Taylor-Johnson) (does not impact scoring)
IS THE FILM’S SCREENWRITER FEMALE? Yes (Kelly Marcel) (does not impact scoring)
BOTTOM LINE: Take one docile female protagonist, render her as a passive sexual object of a man, depict her with a male gaze that is weirdly inappropriate for the intended female audience, and you have in one tidy package everything that is wrong with how Hollywood represents women onscreen.
NOTE: This is not a “review” of Fifty Shades of Grey! It is simply an examination of how well or how poorly it represents women. (A movie that represents women well can still be a terrible film; a movie that represents women poorly can still be a great film.) Read my review of Fifty Shades of Grey.
See the full rating criteria. (Criteria that do not apply to this film have been deleted in this rating for maximum readability.)