BASIC REPRESENTATION SCORE: +10
FEMALE AGENCY/POWER/AUTHORITY SCORE: +5
THE MALE GAZE SCORE: 0
GENDER/SEXUALITY SCORE: -5
WILDCARD SCORE: +5
Is there anything either positive or negative in the film’s representation of women not already accounted for here? (points will vary)
Ruffnut, one of the hero’s gang of sidekicks, gets to express her sexual desire for a hot guy, and the film also offers us her female-gazey perspective as she looks at him. Her attraction to him is a recurring motif, and nicely balances out the (far more clichéd) lusting after her that two of her male compatriots engage in.
TOTAL SCORE: +15
IS THE FILM’S DIRECTOR FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
IS THE FILM’S SCREENWRITER FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
BOTTOM LINE: This is how you portray women in a film with a male protagonist: as a mother who is not defined solely by her motherhood, as a girlfriend who gets to rescue the hero (and take over his leadership in his absence), as part of a mixed-gender gang with desires of her own (just like the guys get to have).
NOTE: This is not a “review” of How to Train Your Dragon 2! It is simply an examination of how well or how poorly it represents women. (A movie that represents women well can still be a terrible film; a movie that represents women poorly can still be a great film.) Read my review of How to Train Your Dragon 2.
See the full rating criteria. (Criteria that do not apply to this film have been deleted in this rating for maximum readability.)