BASIC REPRESENTATION SCORE: 0
[no significant representation of girls/women]
FEMALE AGENCY/POWER/AUTHORITY SCORE: -5
THE MALE GAZE SCORE: 0
[no issues]
GENDER/SEXUALITY SCORE: -10
WILDCARD SCORE: -3
Is there anything either positive or negative in the film’s representation of women not already accounted for here? (points will vary)
While there isn’t quite a hooker with a heart of gold [why this matters], there is a prostitute character who is present solely so that she can be contrasted with a “decent” woman, as a warning to that decent woman of the fate that awaits her — infamy and disgrace — if she steps out of line.
TOTAL SCORE: -18
IS THE FILM’S DIRECTOR FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
IS THE FILM’S SCREENWRITER FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
BOTTOM LINE: A grieving mother in denial about her loss. A grieving wife in denial about her loss. But only a man sees clearly enough to do something about it. So of course, this is his story, not theirs. The grief of women isn’t their own: it is a prompt to kick a man into action.
Click here for the ongoing ranking of 2015’s films for female representation.
NOTE: This is not a “review” of The Water Diviner! It is simply an examination of how well or how poorly it represents women. (A movie that represents women well can still be a terrible film; a movie that represents women poorly can still be a great film.) Read my review of The Water Diviner.
See the full rating criteria. (Criteria that do not apply to this film have been deleted in this rating for maximum readability.)
This rating is brought to you without paywall restrictions by my generous Kickstarter supporters. If you missed out on the Kickstarter and would like to support this project, you may:
• become a monthly or yearly subscriber of FlickFilospher.com
• make a pledge at Patreon
• make a donation via Paypal