
BASIC REPRESENTATION SCORE: -10
FEMALE AGENCY/POWER/AUTHORITY SCORE: +3
THE MALE GAZE SCORE: -35
GENDER/SEXUALITY SCORE: -20
WILDCARD SCORE: -5
Is there anything either positive or negative in the film’s representation of women not already accounted for here? (points will vary)
One character in the mostly male ensemble is defined almost exclusively by his nonstop misogyny: he speaks nary a line of dialogue that isn’t about objectifying women and debating with himself whether they will want to fuck him.
TOTAL SCORE: -67
IS THE FILM’S DIRECTOR FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
IS THE FILM’S SCREENWRITER FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
BOTTOM LINE: Eighty percent of the women in the world of this movie are present solely so they may be judged on their fuckability; another 10 percent of women are present so that we may find it funny that they are upset over being treated like blowup dolls; the final 10 percent is evenly divided between a nagging wife and a saintly mother-to-be. This would appear to be the sum total of women’s jobs in Hollywood.
Click here for the ongoing ranking of 2015’s films for female representation.
NOTE: This is not a “review” of Entourage! It is simply an examination of how well or how poorly it represents women. (A movie that represents women well can still be a terrible film; a movie that represents women poorly can still be a great film.) Read my review of Entourage.
See the full rating criteria. (Criteria that do not apply to this film have been deleted in this rating for maximum readability.)
This rating is brought to you without paywall restrictions by my generous Kickstarter supporters. If you missed out on the Kickstarter and would like to support this project, you may:
• become a monthly or yearly subscriber of FlickFilospher.com
• make a pledge at Patreon
• make a donation via Paypal



















I’m genuinely surprised the ranking isn’t lower. I thought the movie would set a new record.
So did I.
They can’t even get that right…