
FEMALE AGENCY/POWER/AUTHORITY SCORE: +11
THE MALE GAZE SCORE: 0
[no issues]
GENDER/SEXUALITY SCORE: 0
[no issues]
WILDCARD SCORE: 0
Is there anything either positive or negative in the film’s representation of women not already accounted for here? (points will vary)
No.
TOTAL SCORE: +36
IS THE FILM’S DIRECTOR FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
IS THE FILM’S SCREENWRITER FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
BOTTOM LINE: Every single role played by a woman in this film — and there are many, including ones in significant positions of authority and professional expertise — could have been played by a man without changing a single line of dialogue. Women’s competence, intelligence, and professionalism are taken for granted, and they are not sexualized, abused, or demeaned because of their gender in any way at all. This might be a fantasy in real life, but seeing it onscreen is a step in the direction of making it a reality.
Click here for the ongoing ranking of 2015’s films for female representation.
NOTE: This is not a “review” of Survivor! It is simply an examination of how well or how poorly it represents women. (A movie that represents women well can still be a terrible film; a movie that represents women poorly can still be a great film.) Read my review of Survivor.
See the full rating criteria. (Criteria that do not apply to this film have been deleted in this rating for maximum readability.)
This rating is brought to you without paywall restrictions by my generous Kickstarter supporters. If you missed out on the Kickstarter and would like to support this project, you may:
• become a monthly or yearly subscriber of FlickFilospher.com
• make a pledge at Patreon
• make a donation via Paypal



















Yay, scriptwriter, you managed to avoid hitting the generic female character clichés in your headlong career along Cliché Alley.