BASIC REPRESENTATION SCORE: +10
FEMALE AGENCY/POWER/AUTHORITY SCORE: 0
[no significant representation of women in authority]
THE MALE GAZE SCORE: 0
[no issues]
GENDER/SEXUALITY SCORE: -5
WILDCARD SCORE: 0
Is there anything either positive or negative in the film’s representation of women not already accounted for here? (points will vary)
No.
TOTAL SCORE: +5
IS THE FILM’S DIRECTOR FEMALE? Yes (Ami Canaan Mann) (does not impact scoring)
IS THE FILM’S SCREENWRITER FEMALE? Yes (Ami Canaan Mann) (does not impact scoring)
BOTTOM LINE: Romance for the female coprotagonist here isn’t the be-all and end-all of her existence (nor is the fact that she is a mother), but rather something that she incorporates into her complicated life, and from which she draws inspiration for that life and for her identity as her own person.
Click here for the ongoing ranking of 2015’s films for female representation.
NOTE: This is not a “review” of Jackie & Ryan! It is simply an examination of how well or how poorly it represents women. (A movie that represents women well can still be a terrible film; a movie that represents women poorly can still be a great film.) Read my review of Jackie & Ryan.
See the full rating criteria. (Criteria that do not apply to this film have been deleted in this rating for maximum readability.)
This rating is brought to you without paywall restrictions by my generous Kickstarter supporters. If you missed out on the Kickstarter and would like to support this project, you may:
• become a monthly or yearly subscriber of FlickFilospher.com
• make a pledge at Patreon
• make a donation via Paypal