curated: “What It’s Like to Be a Female Movie Critic in the #MeToo Era”

Manohla Dargis says it all. I could have written every word of this. From The New York Times:

What I know from a life of watching and reviewing movies is that outrage is tedious, and exhausting. Sometimes it is just easier to go with the flow, though much depends on what’s happening onscreen and off. Sometimes, I don’t want to let a movie’s banal, casual sexism ruin my good time. So, I make expedient and strategic bargains with myself, glossing over some of the sexism and ignoring things that bother me (or trying to). I decide that the absence of female characters is acceptable or not too bad and maybe narratively justifiable. I want to keep grooving on the virtuosity of the directing, keep loving the (male) characters, the camerawork, gripping story and mysterious light.

More…

I might just send this link to every fanboy from now on who wails about how I’ve ruined his life because because I don’t adore unreservedly the movies he loves, or — oddly conversely — how I’m a hypocrite for not being a raging SJW lesbian cat lady all the time.

share and enjoy
               
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
subscribe
notify of
6 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
RogerBW
RogerBW
Wed, Jan 02, 2019 2:49pm

Good stuff.

And of course a bias in favour of me is “just the way things are” and “what the audience wants”; a bias in favour of you is “making everything political”.

Phil K
Phil K
reply to  RogerBW
Fri, Jan 04, 2019 3:09pm

And demanding what the fans DON’T want is “just you” eh Roger ?

LaSargenta
LaSargenta
Thu, Jan 03, 2019 10:21pm

Aaaaand, this is why I couldn’t do the job you do.

I have a very hard time making bargains like this. I mean, I can make one with my frontal lobes, but my brain stem will be nauseated. Astoundingly, the sexism I encounter, I can deal with more directly and I don’t need to make any nauseating bargains. (Doesn’t mean there are NO bargains, just that the ones I’ve got don’t make me queasy.)

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  LaSargenta
Fri, Jan 04, 2019 8:52am

The bargaining isn’t about my job. It’s about watching and enjoying movies as anything other than a straight white cis able-bodied man. If you’re doing that, you’re bargaining.

Phil K
Phil K
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Fri, Jan 04, 2019 3:11pm

Twaddle. Ranting against Aquaman because it was too masculine and didn’t bore the pants off viewers to please the tiny self-obsessed “metoo” feminazis
“How dare a film called Aquaman be about Aquaman and not what we rant about ?”

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Phil K
Fri, Jan 04, 2019 5:35pm

You’re gone.