
Where Are the Women? Charlie’s Country
A perfect illustration of how men’s stories are intended to be universally applicable to all people, even as they ignore the unique challenges women face. [This post is not behind the paywall.]

A perfect illustration of how men’s stories are intended to be universally applicable to all people, even as they ignore the unique challenges women face. [This post is not behind the paywall.]

Every single role played by a woman in this film — and there are many — could have been played by a man without changing a single line of dialogue. [This post is not behind the paywall.]

Behold yet another stock supportive wife: noble, long-suffering, making the best of the messes her husband is constantly getting their family into. [This post is not behind the paywall.]

A fantastic example of how casting women in roles that could have been played by men adds layers of cultural commentary that wouldn’t otherwise be present. [This post is not behind the paywall.]

Women do not exist in the world of this film except as motivating factors for men. [This post is not behind the paywall.]

The female coprotagonist here totally up-ends onscreen stereotypes about women, and she is not depicted as broken or unfeminine for doing so. [This post is not behind the paywall.]

Hooray for a story about a woman, but boo for how retrograde it is. This is a movie about literally nothing except her romantic desperation. [This post is not behind the paywall.]

Women exist here primarily to be rescued by men, and they are defined only by their relationships with men. [This post is not behind the paywall.]

There is only one woman in this movie, and she is present only so that we can be “amused” by how she is mistreated and demeaned by the male protagonist. [This post is not behind the paywall.]

A woman is dead, brutally murdered. Forget about her, though. It is vitally important that we understand how a bunch of men feel about this. [This post is not behind the paywall.]