obsession boyfriend i'm psyched     i'm dreading enemy

(need an explanation?)

advertisements


Notes on a Scandal (review)

Futile Attraction

You’d think that the title -- Notes on a Scandal-- would clue you in to what you’re in store for with this wonderfully beguiling, deviously absorbing film. Scandal! In all its deliciousness! But it takes a long while, actually, before it suddenly smacks you in the noggin: this is, under the posh British accents and actorly elegance and general high-toned sophistication, a scrumptiously lurid piece of B-movie genre nonsense. And I mean that in the best way possible. This is a huge lark of a movie, an enormous pleasure of smart, intricate performances, twisty plotting, and sinful sensationalism. Imagine Single White Female as mounted by the Royal Shakespeare Company, and you’ve got it. Oh, snickered the critic longing for smart silliness, do I love this movie.


more below the ad... scroll down...


Look, you’ve got A) your psycho bride of Sappho who latches like a leech onto B) your diaphanous airhead who flutters through life like a pretty butterfly, and just because they are played by, respectively, Dame Judi Dench and Cate Blanchett, two of the finest actresses working today, two of the finest actresses ever, doesn’t make those trashy characterizations any less true. In fact, it makes the whole shebang ineluctably more sublime, more witty: to see these daunting talents wrestle to the metaphoric ground roaringly stereotyped characters plucked straight from real-life supermarket tabloids or golden-age Hollywood melodrama is a hoot. To see them weave such a fresh tapestry of emotion and drama with these characters that you’re almost fooled into missing how cheaply juicy they are is a marvel.

And I haven’t even gotten to the actual scandal yet.

I’d hesitate to reveal the nature of that scandal, except that it’s a twist the likes of which have indeed been all over the real trashploitation “news,” so much so that for the film to have relied on it for its shock value would have been unforgiveable. It doesn’t, so I’ll tell you. It’s like this: Barbara Covett (Dench: Casino Royale, Pride & Prejudice) and Sheba Hart (Blanchett: The Aviator, The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou) are teachers at what we in the States would call a public high school, a zoo of wild teenagers driven by raging hormones. Barbara is the old hand, a fusty creature who sees her job primarily as corralling the monsters until they can be foisted off into the real world; Sheba is the newbie, a potter whose family demands have kept her out of the workplace for years, but now she’s back and trying her hand at instilling artistic sensibilities in young’uns -- she is, as cynical Barbara might sniff, an idealist. Sheba wants to feel an affinity with her students, and -- whoops! -- that ends with her actually, ahem, fucking one of them (Andrew Simpson). Who’s 15. And she’s already got a man, her lovely husband, Richard (Bill Nighy: Flushed Away, Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest).

Oh dear.

Now, Notes clearly distinguishes itself -- with a kind of quiet, intellectual fury that in a decent and proper world would characterize a helluva lot more movies -- from every made-for-Lifetime weepy-shocker that could have been spun from this basic plot. And it does so by giving us the story mostly through the eyes of Barbara: these are her “notes,” her diary of her friendship with Sheba, her take on what Sheba needs to get through this trial. Except Barbara is a bit loony. Maybe more than a bit. Her interest in Sheba is a bit sinister. Maybe more than a bit. Not in that crazy-lesbian way of, say, those hilariously insane 50s exploitation flicks that warned nice young women about the horrors of being seduced by a dyke... but if you detect a touch of that here, you know: tee-hee. The thing is, Barbara does not have Sheba’s best interests at heart. We know that. Sheba doesn’t know it -- and the really intriguing thing is that Barbara herself may not know it, either.

There are whole levels of suspense at work here that have nothing to do with “Will Sheba and her too-young lover get caught?” or the criminal-justice aspects of the situation or even the kind of righteous punishment those made-for-Lifetime weepy-shockers typically dole out to women who misbehave. That women pay one price or another no matter what they do or who they are -- whether they’re gay or straight, married or single, “good” or “bad” -- is an absolute given. What’s going on here -- the clever script is by Patrick Marber (Closer), based on a Booker Prize-shortlisted novel by Zoe Heller; the excellent direction is by Richard Eyre, who made the little-seen but similarly compelling Stage Beauty -- is a far more incisive exploration of what happens when two women who have different ways of coping with those prices collide.

Delusion and obsession: they are what’s at the crux of Notes, a fixed object around which Barbara and Sheba orbit. They’re orbiting separately, but when those orbits cross: meow. Dench and Blanchett are electrifying separately, but together, especially when things start to go bad between them? Wow.

(Technorati tags: , , )

viewed at home on a small screen
rated R for language and some aberrant sexual content
official site | IMDB

comments

I tend to have an initial reaction of irritated impatience, or impatient irritation maybe, when I see all the hullaballoo in media reporting on current day older women and under-aged boys scenarios. I tend to want to ignore it as not nearly so newsworthy as the time it eats up. So I did not feel this was a subject I wanted to see on the big screen, and I wondered why the 2 screen gems, Blanchett and Dench, would spend their time with this bosh. But then, why indeed? Unless, maybe the film is more about the interplay between these women than the tiresome scandel itself? And you do go on about how devilishly and deliciously entertaining the movie is. Well. Okay. Now I'm interested. I might just go see it.

My first reaction to learning about what the film's scandal is was similar to yours, Sherry -- this is not a topic I prefer to see given as glossy treatment. But that's not what this film is about. In a way, it's almost a satire on the way the larger culture approach these kinds of non-news news stories. Give it a chance.

It's very strange how so many reviewers and people blanch at this hot, seductive topic.

FF nails it: it's about obsession and self-delusion. The core scenes are those of revealed truth, where narcisissitic selves are revealed or unmasked and confronted. This exposure makes this very true to life.

As for titilation, South Carolina recently make 14 the age of consent - and for over two decades, The Netherlands had this age (until EU pressure changed that). Our young pramour is older than that. Put these purient objections aside, and deal with the stack of emotions, simmering and unleashed.

It's a ride of true-to-life proportions. Believe it.

The reason why some people would object to the basic story of this film is not about prurience -- it's about the very opposite: it's about not wanting to see this subject treated in a prurient way. No matter what the age of consent is in South Carolina or the Netherlands, the story takes place in England, where the age of consent is 16, I believe, unless that's changed too. The boy the Blanchett character has a sexual relationship with is 15.

But that's not to say that everything would be fine after his next birthday. "Relationships" like this one are an abuse of power, which is why we frown on them, or should do so. This movie does explore it partly from the angle. And it also explores how sexual frustration leads people to do strange things.

Anyway, Orson and I are in basic agreement: this film in no way endorses the student-teacher sexual relationship or makes it look sexy and fun.

post a comment

who I am


I'm MaryAnn Johanson: writer and ponderer in New York City who drinks too much wine and thinks way too much about such inconsequences as movies, TV, books, and the meaning of life.
[email me]

• contributor, Film.com
• member, Online Film Critics Society
• member, Alliance of Women Film Journalists
• member, International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences
• visit my scratchpad blog, MaryAnnJohanson.com
• read my Doctor Who fan fiction

photo by David Speranza

(postings feed)

Add to Technorati Favorites

monthly archives

recent screenings and hot movies

just opened
yellow for maybe Diminished Capacity
yellow for maybe The Wackness
green for go Hancock
green for go Kit Kittredge: An American Girl
box office top 5
green for go Wall-E
green for go Wanted
yellow for maybe Get Smart
green for go Kung Fu Panda
green for go The Incredible Hulk
top limited releases
green for go Mongol
green for go The Visitor
When Did You Last See Your Father?
green for go Kit Kittredge: An American Girl
Then She Found Me
coming soon
green for go Man on Wire
yellow for maybe Journey to the Center of the Earth 3D
red for no Harold
yellow for maybe Hellboy II: The Golden Army
red for no Fly Me to the Moon
yellow for maybe A Thousand Years of Good Prayers
now playing
red for no The Love Guru
red for no The Happening
yellow for maybe You Don't Mess With the Zohan
green for go Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
green for go The Fall
green for go Young@Heart
yellow for maybe Quid Pro Quo
red for no Sex and the City: The Movie
red for no The Strangers
green for go Dreams With Sharp Teeth
green for go Iron Man
green for go The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian

2008 screening log

advertisements

search

Google
flickfilosopher.com
web
Powered by
Movable Type 3.36