counting down the best films of 2006: No. 9, ‘Letters from Iwo Jima’

WHY IS THIS ONE OF THE BEST FILMS OF THE YEAR?: War is hell … except when it comes to war movies, which, when done with sensitivity and keen perception, offer some of the more provocative insights into what it means to be human — at the most fundamental level, where we’re stripped of cultural conditioning — especially under the most trying of circumstances.

SO WHY THIS AND NOT FLAGS OF OUR FATHERS?: The two films are bookends, there’s no question about that, but where it seems that Clint Eastwood could not resist sentimentalizing the American perspective on the Battle of Iwo Jima, the very alienness of the Japanese perspective for American audiences inherently resists schmaltzifying. We’re sentimental about things that are familiar — it’s hard to get sappy over people and places and cultures we don’t know. But that isn’t to say that there’s no sentiment to Letters: its power comes from its genuine emotion — longing for absent family, for instance, for a way of life that may be lost forever — that is recognizable to everyone, no matter where you were born and how you were raised. Eastwood deployed a sledgehammer of emotion with Flags, but with Letters, he uses a feather, and is much more effective for it.

THIS IS REALLY ALL ABOUT THE CURRENT WAR IN IRAQ, ISN’T IT?: If the shoe fits… Letters is about some basic realities of war, particularly the ones we seem to forget when we’re smack in the middle of one. Like the fact that bizarre ideas about what constitutes patriotism can lead an army, or a nation, off a cliff. Like the fact that there are atrocities and kindnesses on both sides. Like the fact that understanding your enemy is vital to winning … but that if you get too close, you “risk” humanizing him too much, so that you start to wonder what the hell you’re fighting for in the first place.

[See the whole best-of list for 2006 here.]

share and enjoy
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll measure. If you’re not a spammer or a troll, your comment will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately.
notify of
1 Comment
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
Fri, Apr 13, 2007 6:39pm

>>Eastwood deployed a sledgehammer of emotion with Flags

Oh, don’t be so fucking stupid. Flags was as understated as any of Eastwood’s work. Seriously, what IS it with you? There seems to be this irrational leap to judgement without even bothering to think about the movie. Flags was no more sentimental than Letters was and whilst Flags has a few minor flaws that render it ‘merely’ a superb movie, Letters is a flat out masterpiece.