your £$ support needed

part of a small rebellion | by maryann johanson

British box office: ‘The House Bunny’ ain’t so dumb after all…

My experiment with exploring global box office numbers continues. I think I’ll eventually start looking at numbers beyond North America and the U.K., but I’m trying to get a hold on what the U.K. box office numbers mean first.

British numbers are not as readily available as North American ones, but it seems that the previous weekend’s figures are available by midweek. So here’s how this past weekend shaped up:

1. The House Bunny: $1.6 million (NEW)
2. Mirrors: $1.5 million (NEW)
3. How to Lose Friends & Alienate People: $1.415 million (2nd week)
4. Taken: $1.377 million (3rd week)
5. Tropic Thunder: $.96 million (4th week)
I need to get more of a grip on how to interpret some of these numbers, and I don’t even know where to begin: there simply isn’t as much analysis of box-office numbers outside of North America as there is for the numbers within. Still, the idea that if a film sees a dropoff in business of less than 50 percent after its opening weekend, that’s a good thing, probably holds for the U.K. too. And look at this: the Simon Pegg comedy How to Lose Friends… dropped only 29 percent in its second week, and the Liam Neeson thriller Taken dropped only 28 percent in its third week. That must mean people actually like the films and are spreading good word-of-mouth, and that marketing isn’t the driving force in getting people into theaters. Whatever I think of the films — I’ve now seen How to Lose…, and liked it; I won’t see Taken till January, most likely, unless I spring for a trip to London for New Year’s like I’m fantasizing — it’s always better if it’s genuine general acclaim for a movie that puts butts in seats, rather than advertising.

Speaking of finding more analysis of the British box office… it’s bizarre. If you Google “british box office” the first results that come up are historical, and then my postings about the numbers. Googling “uk box office” produces somewhat more promising results, such as Charles Gant at the Guardian’s film blog, where for this week’s numbers, he notes that The House Bunny earned its spot at the top of the chart even though it earned less than £1 million, which is a rare thing. Gant also notes that this past weekend, Mamma Mia! had its first noticeable decline… after 14 weeks in release and a cumulative U.K. take of £65 ($113.5) million,

making it the third biggest ever UK hit, after Titanic and the first Harry Potter. With another £1 million in takings – a feat it will easily manage – Mamma Mia! will overtake the latter to nab the number-two spot in the all-time hall of commercial fame. (For context, the second biggest hit of the year, The Dark Knight, has grossed £48 million.)

Wow. ABBA bigger than Batman? Amazing.

[numbers via The Hollywood Reporter]

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/flick/public_html/wptest/wp-content/themes/FlickFilosopher/loop-single.php on line 106
posted in:
movie buzz

  • JoshDM


  • Paul Hayes

    It’s like I said in one of your earlier British box office threads – in terms of public consciousness and popular culture, they were very much the Beatles of the 1970s, and thus hold huge nostalgic appeal here. Certainly a bigger sway than Batman as cultural figures, I would say.

  • Mark

    Are the UK figures you get actually in US dollars, or are they in pounds? I’d rather see the UK box office in pounds — since the variable exchange rate can distort the meanings of the figures in terms of number of tickets sold.

  • MaryAnn

    The figures I’ve been listing come from my source in dollars (I wasn’t doing the conversion). I previously hadn’t had a source that listed the takes in pounds… but now that I’ve found one, I’ll list pounds from now on (or maybe both dollars and pounds). I had actually been worried about the exchange rate, and how that impacts the numbers… and I still am. It makes it even harder to compare across borders.

  • jakob1978

    Here’s the IMDB’s UK Top Ten, which is in pounds


Pin It on Pinterest