David Tennant’s ‘Hamlet’ tomorrow night on PBS

At long last, the filmed version of the Royal Shakespeare Company’s Hamlet — starring David Tennant, with Patrick Stewart as Claudius — is arriving on American television, on PBS’s Great Performances:

Shakespeare’s immortal “To be, or not to be” takes on a whole new meaning (and medium) as classical stage and screen actors David Tennant and (recently-knighted) Sir Patrick Stewart reprise their roles for a modern-dress, film-for-television adaptation of the Royal Shakespeare Company’s (RSC) 2008 stage production of Hamlet. The production will be presented on PBS by the Great Performances series on Wednesday, April 28, 2010, at 8 p.m. EST (check local listings). Immediately following the broadcast, the film will be available online in its entirety here on the Great Performances Web site.

I wrote about the stage version when I saw it in Stratford-upon-Avon in the fall of 2008. I hope to get a chance to write about the filmed version later this week: I’m curious to see how it stands up next to the stage production.

The DVD will be released in Region 1 on May 4th, and is available to preorder from Amazon U.S. and Amazon Canada. It is already available in Region 2 from Amazon U.K.

share and enjoy
               
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
subscribe
notify of
11 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
Brian
Brian
Tue, Apr 27, 2010 12:25pm

Wow! Thanks for the heads-up. I will definitely assign this to the DVR.

It will be interesting to see how Mr. Stewart approaches Claudius differently now than he did 30 years ago when he was Claudius in the Derek Jacobi version.

bronxbee
Tue, Apr 27, 2010 12:47pm

very differently.

also, i will be interested to see if PBS (and/or the RSC) leaves in the more devious, delirious and delightful sexual innuendos (some of them aren’t even innuendo!) and references. they added quite a bit in making the characters human and interesting… but they were a bit… wow!

Persephone
Tue, Apr 27, 2010 12:56pm

They’re there in the DVD, bronxbee….

bronxbee
Tue, Apr 27, 2010 1:29pm

oh, that’s good! i have had the dvd for a while, just haven’t had the chance to watch it. dvds and broadcast are very different though… i’ll have to watch both.

zepto
zepto
Tue, Apr 27, 2010 2:06pm

Thank you so much for posting this, I would have missed it otherwise.

Lisa
Lisa
Tue, Apr 27, 2010 2:51pm

Enjoy, America, Enjoy!

Fabritius
Fabritius
Wed, Apr 28, 2010 10:04pm

Abysmal…truly abysmal effort.I was looking forward to it,as Hamlet is my favorite play.Histrionic and unconvincing, Tennant is out of his depth here.

Daniel
Daniel
Wed, Apr 28, 2010 11:34pm

Gregory Doran, the director, really needs to be declared an enemy of society. I’d like to think, since I like David Tennant, that the problem was that he stuck too closely to his stage performance. In the theatre, he had to perform the lines broadly enough that they registered with people seated in the back of the auditorium. A performance on film, generally speaking, needs to be quieter and more subtle. This production wasn’t subtle. My inclination is to blame the director, since–at least in the televised version–he muddled the editing, the blocking, the tone of many of the later scenes, the use of symbolism, and the jarring combination of time periods. The cinematography, however, was quite nice. But seriously, how do you fuck up Hamlet, with that cast, and how do you fuck it up that badly?

VT
VT
Thu, Apr 29, 2010 12:28am

Well, I rather liked it. Of course I’m fully aware that I can’t judge anything with David Tennant in it completely dispassionately… :-)
The muscle T-shirt was hilarious, though. Perfect.

Althea
Althea
Thu, Apr 29, 2010 7:43pm

I like it, too. A lot. What I appreciate most in modern productions is the chance to see, by the actors’ or directors’ interpretations, what the original production might have meant to Shakespeare’s contemporaries. All we ever saw till the last few decades was romanticized, poetic readings, meant to do justice to his legend. It wasn’t till Baz Luhrmann’s “Romeo+Juliet” that I had a reasonable idea of how one could appreciate the story more than the poetry and language. This “Hamlet” helped me to get how some of the speeches fit the action.

People who saw these plays at the (original) Globe Theatre weren’t there to kneel at the feet of Shakespeare the legend, they went to hoot and holler at the comedy or gasp at the drama. I like getting a taste of that.

Joanne
Joanne
Fri, Apr 30, 2010 9:27am

@Daniel:

A performance on film, generally speaking, needs to be quieter and more subtle.

I’m surprised you found it wasn’t subtle actually. What about those moments where Tennant talks directly to the camera? Or his “O that this too too solid flesh” monologue, which I thought began very subtly indeed?

What I liked about this production is how stagy it was, actually. As I couldn’t see the play on stage it was good to get a feel of that. It reminded me very much of the McKellen/Dench/Nunn Scottish Play which I saw when doing GCSE drama at school.

Admittedly I too cannot be particularly objective when it comes to David Tennant, because I do think he’s wonderful. :)