in case you had any doubt about who controls our media

Exxon Mobil

Have you seen the mess from the massive oil spill in Arkansas? Who even knew there was oil anywhere in the vicinity of Arkansas? From Mother Jones:

Reporters Say Exxon Is Impeding Spill Coverage in Arkansas

On Friday morning, Inside Climate News reported that an Exxon spokesperson told reporter Lisa Song that she could be “arrested for criminal trespass” when she went to the command center to try to find representatives from the EPA and the Department of Transportation. On Friday afternoon, I spoke to the news director from the local NPR affiliate who said he, too, had been threatened with arrest while trying to cover the spill.

This is my favorite part:

Michael Hibblen, who reports for the radio station KUAR, went to the spill site on Wednesday with state Attorney General Dustin McDaniel. McDaniel was in the area to inspect the site and hold a news conference, and Hibblen and a small group of reporters were following him to report on the visit. Upon arrival, representatives from the county sheriff’s office, which is running security at the site, directed the reporters to a boundary point 10 feet away that they should not pass. The reporters agreed to comply. But the tone shifted abruptly, Hibblen told Mother Jones on Friday:

It was less than 90 seconds before suddenly the sheriff’s deputies started yelling that all the media people had to leave, that ExxonMobil had decided they don’t want you here, you have to leave. They even referred to it as “Exxon Media”…Some reporters were like, “Who made this decision? Who can we talk to?” The sheriff’s deputies started saying, “You have to leave. You have 10 seconds to leave or you will be arrested.”

Please note: Local sheriff’s deputies are running security for Exxon, barring journalists. Gotta be unconstitutional, no?

share and enjoy
               
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
subscribe
notify of
3 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
RogerBW
RogerBW
Mon, Apr 08, 2013 10:24am

Mother Jones of course has its own history of biases and distortion. While I find the story quite plausible, I’d like to see some primary sources on this.

LaSargenta
LaSargenta
reply to  RogerBW
Mon, Apr 08, 2013 9:16pm

http://www.thv11.com/news/article/258973/2/Cameras-allowed-where-Mayflower-Exxon-oil-spill-occured “For the first time since the Mayflower oil spill officials allowed the media to see where the rupture occurred.”

And then there’s the InsideClimateNews that Mother Jones quoted: http://insideclimatenews.org/news/20130405/insideclimate-news-reporter-threatened-arrest-ark-oil-spill-site

This was interesting: http://tfr.faa.gov/save_pages/detail_3_8699.html It is my understanding that (1) creating a no-fly zone over a hazard is normal, but (2) there usually are “exceptions” with instructions on how to fly for news aircraft covering an event. Didn’t see any exceptions or instructions in there. Maybe there are some if a pilot contacts the local FSS.

RogerBW
RogerBW
reply to  LaSargenta
Mon, Apr 08, 2013 9:17pm

Thanks. Trust no one, and all that…