The magazine that long ago decided that ogling women in skimpy swimsuits counts as a sport has found a new way to reduce women to objects:
That is the real a promotional alternative cover for Sports Illustrated’s annual swimsuit issue, out next week.
Just two of the kinds of awful this encompasses:
• a Barbie doll is interchangeable with an actual human woman
• a children’s toy has been sexed up
How many others can you come up with? It’s fun, try it!
Think SI will put a Ken doll on the cover of an upcoming issue, as stand-in for a male human being? No, me neither.
Via The New York Times.




















Well, it does rather undercut Sports Illustrated’s claims that they’re not interested in turning women into objects.
Seriously, though, I think what we have here is just some misogynistic trolling and frankly, I’ve seen better.
“The Doll That Started It All”… both vague and ominous. Started what? What “all’? Covers of magazines with unclad women that have nothing to do with sports, or whatever else the subject of (any) magazine is?
Um, the doll that turned women into pieces of plastic AND kicked off the sexualization of little girls?
Hooray.
We’ve got objectification of women, product placement, and a publisher that values sales more than content. It’s everything I hate about America on one magazine cover.
Here’s what Nerissa Nields said about Barbie (or “Barbi,” for legal purposes):
The poem appears on the (pretty terrific) album If You Lived Here, You’d Be Home Now. She also wrote a blog entry about it:
http://nerissanields.blogspot.com/2009/04/barbie.html
At least they’re being honest about it rather than pretending it’s anything to do with actual sports.