
BASIC REPRESENTATION SCORE: -10
FEMALE AGENCY/POWER/AUTHORITY SCORE: 0
[no significant representation of women in authority]
THE MALE GAZE SCORE: -15
GENDER/SEXUALITY SCORE: -45
WILDCARD SCORE: 0
Is there anything either positive or negative in the film’s representation of women not already accounted for here? (points will vary)
No.
TOTAL SCORE: -70
IS THE FILM’S DIRECTOR FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
IS THE FILM’S SCREENWRITER FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
BOTTOM LINE: Women are depicted — as an entire gender — as easily manipulated dupes. Men can feed them the most outrageous and most easily falsifiable lies, and women will buy it, especially if you distract them with fairy-tale white-wedding fantasies.
Click here for the ongoing ranking of 2015’s films for female representation.
NOTE: This is not a “review” of The Wedding Ringer! It is simply an examination of how well or how poorly it represents women. (A movie that represents women well can still be a terrible film; a movie that represents women poorly can still be a great film.) Read my review of The Wedding Ringer.
See the full rating criteria. (Criteria that do not apply to this film have been deleted in this rating for maximum readability.)
This rating is brought to you without paywall restrictions by my generous Kickstarter supporters. If you missed out on the Kickstarter and would like to support this project, you may:
• become a monthly or yearly subscriber of FlickFilospher.com
• make a pledge at Patreon
• make a donation via Paypal



















there should also be a category for “Does an unappealing, slob or schlub manage to get the gorgeous/smart/talented girl in the end?” with at least a -10.
That kind of falls under “Is there a woman who is mostly pretty awesome and perfect who is present to support a man improving himself?” (Though in this instance, that refers to Kevin Hart’s assistant.) It doesn’t apply here because — SPOILER — he doesn’t get her in the end, and she’s kind of horrible anyway.