
BASIC REPRESENTATION SCORE: -20
FEMALE AGENCY/POWER/AUTHORITY SCORE: 0
[no significant representation of women in authority]
THE MALE GAZE SCORE: 0
[no issues]
GENDER/SEXUALITY SCORE: -10
WILDCARD SCORE: -10
Is there anything either positive or negative in the film’s representation of women not already accounted for here? (points will vary)
TOTAL SCORE: -40
IS THE FILM’S DIRECTOR FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
IS THE FILM’S SCREENWRITER FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
BOTTOM LINE: A boy and his dog. And then another boy and the dog. And even the damn dog is male. There’s no reason at all why the male protagonist couldn’t have been female, but girls and women exist in this story solely to guide and advise a boy and a man on their personal betterment, and how that boy and man can have a better relationship with each other. While it is not at all unusual to see women doing nothing but supporting men onscreen, this movie is particularly egregious in how it sidelines women’s own issues regarding events that occur here.
Click here for the ongoing ranking of 2015’s films for female representation.
NOTE: This is not a “review” of Max! It is simply an examination of how well or how poorly it represents women. (A movie that represents women well can still be a terrible film; a movie that represents women poorly can still be a great film.) Read my review of Max.
See the full rating criteria. (Criteria that do not apply to this film have been deleted in this rating for maximum readability.)
This project was launched by my generous Kickstarter supporters. You can support this work now by:
• buying some Where Are the Women? merch
• becoming a monthly or yearly subscriber of FlickFilospher.com
• making a pledge at Patreon
• making a one-time donation via Paypal


















