BASIC REPRESENTATION SCORE: 0
[no significant representation of girls/women]
FEMALE AGENCY/POWER/AUTHORITY SCORE: 0
[no significant representation of women in authority]
THE MALE GAZE SCORE: 0
GENDER/SEXUALITY SCORE: -5
WILDCARD SCORE: 0
Is there anything either positive or negative in the film’s representation of women not already accounted for here? (points will vary)
TOTAL SCORE: -5
IS THE FILM’S DIRECTOR FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
IS THE FILM’S SCREENWRITER FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
BOTTOM LINE: Only three women appear in this movie… and two of them are the wife and daughter of the male founder of Greenpeace, and don’t speak much about their own environmental work but mostly about him and how he worked. The third woman does not appear to be an adjunct to any of the core members of the early organization — who were all male — and she does note, with wry humor, at one point that Greenpeace was very male-dominated in its early years. Still, it’s difficult to imagine that no women played a key role in the beginnings of the organization, as is implied here.
NOTE: This is not a “review” of How to Change the World! It is simply an examination of how well or how poorly it represents women. (A movie that represents women well can still be a terrible film; a movie that represents women poorly can still be a great film.) Read my review of How to Change the World.
See the full rating criteria. (Criteria that do not apply to this film have been deleted in this rating for maximum readability.)
This project was launched by my generous Kickstarter supporters. You can support this work now by: