BASIC REPRESENTATION SCORE: -20
FEMALE AGENCY/POWER/AUTHORITY SCORE: +3
THE MALE GAZE SCORE: 0
GENDER/SEXUALITY SCORE: -10
WILDCARD SCORE: -5
Is there anything either positive or negative in the film’s representation of women not already accounted for here? (points will vary)
Unlike many movies of its ilk, in which it is the unspoken subtext that a woman’s suffering matters only inasmuch that it affects a man and gives him feels, this movie goes out of its way to overtly and explicitly emphasize that the viewer is not to think about the dying girl, not to worry about her at all, and that the man who is watching her suffer is the only person we should be focusing on.
TOTAL SCORE: -32
IS THE FILM’S DIRECTOR FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
IS THE FILM’S SCREENWRITER FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
BOTTOM LINE: The only positive points here are earned by a female school principal who appears very briefly in one short scene. Apart from her, women are either mothering mothers, “hot” girls who exist only to torment teenaged boys with their attractiveness, or are dying of cancer in a Manic Pixie Dream Girl-ish way: that is, only in order to inspire a boy to become a better person. Her cancer is not her own; it serves as a life lesson for the male protagonist.
NOTE: This is not a “review” of Me and Earl and the Dying Girl! It is simply an examination of how well or how poorly it represents women. (A movie that represents women well can still be a terrible film; a movie that represents women poorly can still be a great film.) Read my review of Me and Earl and the Dying Girl.
See the full rating criteria. (Criteria that do not apply to this film have been deleted in this rating for maximum readability.)
This project was launched by my generous Kickstarter supporters. You can support this work now by: