BASIC REPRESENTATION SCORE: -10
FEMALE AGENCY/POWER/AUTHORITY SCORE: 0
[no significant representation of women in authority]
THE MALE GAZE SCORE: 0
GENDER/SEXUALITY SCORE: -5
WILDCARD SCORE: 0
Is there anything either positive or negative in the film’s representation of women not already accounted for here? (points will vary)
TOTAL SCORE: -15
IS THE FILM’S DIRECTOR FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
IS THE FILM’S SCREENWRITER FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
BOTTOM LINE: A good example of a film that would have scored better if it had eliminated a woman — in this case, its stock saintly supportive wife — even though that would have left the movie with no women of any standing at all. (There are a few other extremely minor female characters — including the male protagonist’s teen daughter, who doesn’t speak a single line of dialogue, and a few office secretaries who do nothing but answer phones and close doors — but they are all furniture, not characters.) The movie, though based on a true story, takes many liberties with the truth, so why not pretend that its male protagonist wasn’t married? The wife character serves no purpose whatsoever here except to nobly stand by him while he takes big risks, and then to be in awe of him once his journey is over. She barely has any screen time at all, so the movie wouldn’t be noticeably different without her. This is how bad women’s representation onscreen is, that often it’s better for a movie not to even bother trying to depict women at all.
NOTE: This is not a “review” of Bridge of Spies! It is simply an examination of how well or how poorly it represents women. (A movie that represents women well can still be a terrible film; a movie that represents women poorly can still be a great film.) Read my review of Bridge of Spies.
See the full rating criteria. (Criteria that do not apply to this film have been deleted in this rating for maximum readability.)
This project was launched by my generous Kickstarter supporters. You can support this work now by: