
BASIC REPRESENTATION SCORE: +10
FEMALE AGENCY/POWER/AUTHORITY SCORE: -5
THE MALE GAZE SCORE: 0
[no issues]
GENDER/SEXUALITY SCORE: -15
WILDCARD SCORE: -5
Is there anything either positive or negative in the film’s representation of women not already accounted for here? (points will vary)
In a reversal of the “femininity as a joke” trope, but just as problematic, two tween girls are the butt of an ongoing joke because they reject all things feminine and enjoy football, violent toys, and other things coded masculine.
TOTAL SCORE: -15
IS THE FILM’S DIRECTOR FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
IS THE FILM’S SCREENWRITER FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
BOTTOM LINE: While there are plenty of women here — the ensemble cast is reasonably gender-balanced — nearly every woman here is defined solely through her relationships with men or with children. And while some of the nastily gendered humor here is initially positioned as “bad” and worthy of punishment, eventually it is cast as just another lovable family quirk that no one should get too upset about.
Click here for the ongoing ranking of 2015’s films for female representation.
NOTE: This is not a “review” of Krampus! It is simply an examination of how well or how poorly it represents women. (A movie that represents women well can still be a terrible film; a movie that represents women poorly can still be a great film.) Read my review of Krampus.
See the full rating criteria. (Criteria that do not apply to this film have been deleted in this rating for maximum readability.)
This project was launched by my generous Kickstarter supporters. You can support this work now by:
• buying some Where Are the Women? merch
• becoming a monthly or yearly subscriber of FlickFilospher.com
• making a pledge at Patreon
• making a one-time donation via Paypal


















