This is how they’re selling Into Darkness in the tube in London. Not a sign of Kirk or Spock. It’s all Sherlock.
share and enjoy
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
I agree to the creation of an account at FlickFilosopher.com.
When you log in for the first time via a social-media account, this site collects your email address to automatically create an account for you here. Once your account is created, you’ll be logged in to this account.
disagreeagree
connect with
I agree to the creation of an account at FlickFilosopher.com.
When you log in for the first time via a social-media account, this site collects your email address to automatically create an account for you here. Once your account is created, you’ll be logged in to this account.
It’s the same over here (Croatia) as well. Cumberbatch is everywhere, nobody else in sight. No surprise there, really – the image composition on the posters with Cumberbatch alone is far superior. Every poster I’ve seen online that incorporates Kirk/Spock(/Uhura) has them clearly tacked on and ruining the image.
RogerBW
Wed, May 08, 2013 1:01pm
An actor the UK audience is likely to have seen and appreciated, rather than one of the interchangeable pretty boys. Makes sense to me even before one considered nationalities.
Prankster36
Wed, May 08, 2013 6:40pm
…And apparently the movie is on track to be a bit of a box office dud. Coincidence?
(And I love Cumberbatch. But for fuck’s sake, people, you go to a Star Trek movie to see Kirk, Spock, McCoy, Uhura…not Sherlock. I really hope this miscalculation in the marketing doesn’t reflect the film, but I’m a loooooong way from trusting JJ Abrams completely.)
please help keep truly independent film criticism alive!
Pledge your support now at Patreon or Substack.
FREE regular streaming recommendations via Substack and Patreon.
Or make a one-time or recurring donation via PayPal. (PayPal account not required; debit/credit card payment available.)
shop to support
When you purchase or rent almost anything from Amazon US, Amazon Canada, Amazon UK, and Apple TV, Books, and Music (globally), I get a small affiliate fee that helps support my work. Please use my links if you can! (Affiliate fees do not increase your cost.) Thank you!
It’s the same over here (Croatia) as well. Cumberbatch is everywhere, nobody else in sight. No surprise there, really – the image composition on the posters with Cumberbatch alone is far superior. Every poster I’ve seen online that incorporates Kirk/Spock(/Uhura) has them clearly tacked on and ruining the image.
An actor the UK audience is likely to have seen and appreciated, rather than one of the interchangeable pretty boys. Makes sense to me even before one considered nationalities.
…And apparently the movie is on track to be a bit of a box office dud. Coincidence?
(And I love Cumberbatch. But for fuck’s sake, people, you go to a Star Trek movie to see Kirk, Spock, McCoy, Uhura…not Sherlock. I really hope this miscalculation in the marketing doesn’t reflect the film, but I’m a loooooong way from trusting JJ Abrams completely.)