still heartbroken over Doctor Who (“The Return of Doctor Mysterio” open thread)

the-return-of-doctor-mysterio-promo-cast-image

[previous: “The Husbands of River Song”]

“The Return of Doctor Mysterio” is a big ol’ nothingburger of an alien invasion story that moves around some familiar pieces on the Doctor Who chessboard… and in service of nothing more, it seems, than letting a nerdy comic-book fanboy land the girl of his dreams.

I continue to be done with Doctor Who, and heartbroken over it. Maybe I’ll go watch some old Tom Baker episodes.

Anyway, here’s an open thread for you all to discuss “The Return of Doctor Mysterio,” if you want to. I will monitor comments here — as I do across the site — but don’t be surprised if I don’t participate.

Assume that the comments below are full of spoilers.

This post is not behind the paywall, though if you’re not already a subscriber and you enjoy being able to chat with the community here, please consider subscribing. Thank you.

share and enjoy
               
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
subscribe
notify of
39 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
Jurgan
Jurgan
Tue, Dec 27, 2016 6:36pm

That “superhero costume” is hideous, though maybe it’s a parody. And the bald guy looks like Vincent D’Onofrio as the Kingpin. This is pathetic. I haven’t seen the episode, and this doesn’t make me want to.

Jurgan
Jurgan
Tue, Dec 27, 2016 6:38pm

“letting a nerdy comic-book fanboy land the girl of his dreams.”

This has always been one of Moffat’s weaknesses. “Blink” was a very good episode, but it unfortunately contained a man stalking a woman until she married him and a nerdy guy getting with a girl with very little buildup. Plus Rory and Amy. It wasn’t a big problem at first, but the more I see it repeated the worse it gets.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Jurgan
Wed, Dec 28, 2016 12:21pm

That wasn’t *all* “Blink” was about, though.

Jurgan
Jurgan
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Wed, Dec 28, 2016 5:43pm

Exactly. With hindsight, I can see how relatively minor flaws in Moffat’s early episodes were the cracks in the Doctor Who universe that eventually made the whole thing break apart. Like how I enjoyed Girl in the Fireplace when it aired, but after he reused the idea of a young girl imprinting on the Doctor and then him reuniting with her as an adult with Amy Pond, I started to think the whole thing was a bit creepy. The increasing sexuality of The Doctor was interesting at first, but after a while I started to suspect it was Moffat living out a sexual fantasy. Combine that with the way 12 mocks Clara’s appearance, and The Doctor starts looking like a creepy pick up artist.

RogerBW
RogerBW
Tue, Dec 27, 2016 7:42pm

I can strongly recommend watching the whole of the old show, in order. (I did, and blogged about it.)

I don’t see myself doing that for the new show. It just doesn’t trigger that kind of enthusiasm. The longer it goes on, the more it feels like a tired old dog trying to do the same old tricks but its legs don’t really work any more.

Flynn Sullivan
reply to  RogerBW
Tue, Dec 27, 2016 8:18pm

Hey! I’m doing it right now and blogging!
It’s such a great experience and has kept me going as a Doctor Who fan this year… going to watch Earthshock for the first time tonight!

Jurgan
Jurgan
reply to  RogerBW
Wed, Dec 28, 2016 12:24am

All of the old show? Are you Robert Mugabe?

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  RogerBW
Wed, Dec 28, 2016 12:22pm

I can strongly recommend watching the whole of the old show, in order. (I did, and blogged about it.)

I’ve mostly done that. I have seen all the show in order from the Tom Baker years onward (and almost in real time!). Caught up with previous Doctors in between.

I can binge the Eccleston and Tennant years: those were mostly great.

Flynn Sullivan
Tue, Dec 27, 2016 8:20pm

I thought the episode was okay… it didn’t make much sense, but I liked the characters and there was nothing brutally bad like in Hell Bent. Nardole(or as Capaldi calls him, Nardoul) was a breath of fresh air after years of Clara.
Series 10 looks like a mixed bag, but I’m hopeful.

Kathy_A
Kathy_A
Tue, Dec 27, 2016 9:58pm

I have the entire run of Capaldi on my dvr waiting for me to watch it, and I’m still debating if I even should or if I should just delete them. As a lifelong DW fan, that’s a sad thing for me to have to say.

Elwood72
Elwood72
reply to  Kathy_A
Tue, Dec 27, 2016 11:21pm

There are maybe 4 or 5 good regular season episodes of Capaldi, and some okay ones as well, and for old-school Who fans, Michelle Gomez is the closest they’ve come to the original Roger Delgado master, gender swapping aside. (It’s almost impossible to watch the old Pertwee/Delgado episodes and not suspect that they used to have a thing. . .) But I’m sad to say the majority of it is the worst stuff since the late, unlamented Colin Baker era. Capladi’s a dick, and Clara is a cipher. And the moon, in a solid contender for Worst Episode Ever, is an egg. With spiders living on it. Whatever you do, don’t watch that one. Oddly enough, I don’t mind the Christmas specials, and Capaldi is a charming loon in this one, rather than the jerk with contempt for humanity he’s usually played. The characterization has also changed wildly between seasons, as it must have become obvious it wasn’t working. I wasn’t previously a Moffat-hater, by the way, Eleven was my favorite Doctor and I rather enjoyed the complicated dynamics he had with Amy and Rory. They all seemed like interesting, flawed people. Twelve and Clara just aren’t people at all. My advice – skip Season 8 entirely, Season 9 watch the Dalek ones with Michelle Gomez, and go ahead and watch the Maisie Williams ones if you’re a Game of Thrones fan, and the Christmas specials are okay.

Radek Piskorski
Radek Piskorski
reply to  Elwood72
Sun, Jan 29, 2017 12:50am

I loved Kill the Moon.

Oldwen1120 [INACTIVE}
Oldwen1120 [INACTIVE}
Tue, Dec 27, 2016 11:39pm

I thought this was an overall mediocre episode- I really like Capaldi and Lucas, and the brain stuff was the usual throwaway Christmas story, but the Grant/Lucy plot line was full of plot holes and had the uncomfortable “girl of his dreams” sexism.

The Power of the Daleks was a great throwback-I recommend it if they aired it on TV in the U.K. I’m still excited for Class due to the presence of Patrick Ness- BBC America doesn’t get it until spring.

ketac6
ketac6
Wed, Dec 28, 2016 7:31am

I thought it was better than last year’s Xmas special at least and had some bits of humour in it but yeah, nothing great and nothing very Doctor about it.

Tonio Kruger
Tonio Kruger
Tue, Jan 10, 2017 1:55am

It was probably inevitable that we’d see a Nu Who episode about a superhero. And now that we have, I’ll be very glad if we don’t have to see another one for a long while.

Not that this episode didn’t have its amusing moments. And it was nice to see Capaldi channeling the young Tom Baker for a change rather than take yet another ill-advised take on Marty McFly or Dr. Greg House.

But the plot was very predictable — especially in the episode’s second half — and I really rather not think too much about how the superhero of the week managed to retain his powers for so long.

Hu
Hu
Sun, Jan 22, 2017 2:07am

What I think is upseting about this episode is the fact that the Doctor isn’t supposed to be able to go back to NY, it’s the reason he couldn’t go back in the past to see Amy and Rory
So does that mean he found a way to see them again? Anyway I didn’t like this episode, it doesnt make much sense. It just didn’t feel like watching a DW episode…

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Hu
Tue, Jan 24, 2017 1:03pm

the Doctor isn’t supposed to be able to go back to NY

Ha! I forgot about that.

Radek Piskorski
Radek Piskorski
reply to  Hu
Sun, Jan 29, 2017 12:51am

I think he can’t go 1930s NY only. But apparently he was there precisely to try to “fix” time in order to be able to do precisely that, which is a weird plot point.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Radek Piskorski
Tue, Jan 31, 2017 4:25pm

I think he can’t go 1930s NY only.

So he could have popped forward a few years and rescued Amy and Rory. And he didn’t. Maybe he’s just an asshole… which, to be fair, does seem to be a lot of what Moffat seems to have been saying about the character.

Reginald Anselm Leppik
Reginald Anselm Leppik
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Sun, May 07, 2017 2:31pm

Are you going to come back? Because Series 10 is really really good. For real.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Reginald Anselm Leppik
Mon, May 08, 2017 10:02am

I’m watching it. I don’t think it’s really good. It feels very familiar and covering ground we’ve seen before. I like Bill, but the stories have been blah so far.

Danielm80
Danielm80
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Mon, May 08, 2017 11:24am

I agree, mostly, especially after this week’s episode, but I like Bill. I like her a lot, mainly because: Pearl Mackie. But I also feel like someone told the writers: Imagine that you’re a young person in the real world. You’ve never heard of a Dalek. You’ve never heard of the TARDIS. If someone told you about those things, you probably wouldn’t believe them. But, like most people, you have watched TV and seen movies, and you know all the standard conventions. How would you react to the Doctor?

I feel like that perspective has brought a freshness to episodes that, otherwise, seem very familiar, because Bill has never seen these things before, but she’s also skeptical enough to question everything the Doctor does, and to make fun of the tropes of the show.

And I surprised myself by liking the emoji episode a whole lot, even though it was about emoji robots.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Danielm80
Mon, May 08, 2017 1:25pm

Except Bill *should* know what Daleks are, because they’re been seen flying in the skies over London!

Danielm80
Danielm80
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Mon, May 08, 2017 2:53pm

I know, but I’ve failed to notice enough big events in New York that I can sort of believe it. More than a dozen stores burned down a few blocks from my apartment, and I didn’t find out until a few weeks later. I thought, “Oh, that’s why I heard all those sirens.”

Bluejay
Bluejay
reply to  Danielm80
Mon, May 08, 2017 3:30pm

“New York is peculiarly constructed to absorb almost anything that comes along (whether a thousand-foot liner out of the East or a twenty-thousand-man convention out of the West) without inflicting the event on its inhabitants, so that every event is, in a sense, optional, and the inhabitant is in the happy position of being able to choose his spectacle and so conserve his soul.” – E.B. White

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Danielm80
Tue, May 09, 2017 10:19am

But fires are ordinary, everyday events. Alien robots in the skies above us, not so much. *Everyone* would be talking about that, there’d be video all over the Net and TV. You’d have to be a special kind of incurious to miss it, and Bill is anything but incurious.

Reginald Anselm Leppik
Reginald Anselm Leppik
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Tue, May 09, 2017 4:11pm

I thought Victory Of The Daleks made it clear that all the RTD era Earth invasions were forgotten.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Reginald Anselm Leppik
Tue, May 09, 2017 8:23pm

Well, that Lindsay Duncan character on Mars far in the future remembers at least one of them…

Reginald Anselm Leppik
Reginald Anselm Leppik
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Tue, May 09, 2017 8:57pm

RTD also had the Doctor notice that the giant Cyberman in Victorian London did not become a part of history, which Moffat explained in Time Of Angels as the crack erasing people’s memories. And since then, there’s been no mention of those attacks.
It’s incredibly contrived, for sure, but we might as well move on now. For all intents and purposes, they never happened.

RogerBW
RogerBW
reply to  Reginald Anselm Leppik
Wed, May 10, 2017 5:55am

You go erasing people’s memories, undoing events, and so on, you’re effectively saying “all that stuff you cared about as a viewer didn’t really matter, har har har aren’t I clever and Literary”. Do enough of it and you sour people permanently on the series.
Thus presumably the loss of about a million viewers per season since 2012, not helped by long production breaks. They’ve bucked it up a bit with the premiere but it seems to be dropping again.

Reginald Anselm Leppik
Reginald Anselm Leppik
reply to  RogerBW
Wed, May 10, 2017 7:08am

The memory-erasing happened years before the ratings began to drop, and a lot of people took to Matt Smith straight away. It’s stagnation that hurts the show, not the choice to ignore RTD’s era.

bronxbee
bronxbee
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Mon, May 08, 2017 6:10pm

another example of Moffat ret-conning all his story lines.

RogerBW
RogerBW
reply to  bronxbee
Mon, May 08, 2017 6:20pm

Letting the alien invasions go public has the inevitable consequence that people know about aliens – and that’s always been downplayed in the show, since it should be changing society beyond recognition.
And without messing about with time on a really huge scale, there’s no way to un-do that.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  RogerBW
Tue, May 09, 2017 10:20am

This is part of the problem with setting so many stories on contemporary Earth.

RogerBW
RogerBW
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Tue, May 09, 2017 11:10am

Yes, which the original show fixed even in the Earth-bound era by:

– keeping most of the invasions contained rather than national news; or when they weren’t, they were a plague outbreak or a space disaster rather than aliens. (Yes, I know there are exceptions!)
– narrative convention that modern Earth remains modern Earth, and weirdnesses don’t affect it in any significant way
I can see the appeal of saying “there is a great big spaceship next to (well-known landmark)”, and borrowing newsreaders, but such actions have consequences.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  RogerBW
Tue, May 09, 2017 4:16pm

And of course the world is different now, with the Internet and 24-hour news and social media. Even a small-scale alien invasion wouldn’t stay secret for long today. :-)

RogerBW
RogerBW
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Tue, May 09, 2017 4:29pm

Yeah, one of the few good things (IMO) about Twitter and Facebook is the collapse of cryptozoology, UFO sightings, etc.
Of course there are other conspiracy theories instead.

Danielm80
Danielm80
reply to  bronxbee
Mon, May 08, 2017 6:26pm

If I ever get a goldfish, I’m going to name it Moffat.

And now that I think of it, goldfish don’t blink, do they?

Reginald Anselm Leppik
Reginald Anselm Leppik
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Mon, May 08, 2017 12:34pm

That’s fair enough. For me, characters are the most important part of a good story, that’s why I found Clara’s era such a struggle. Bill suits the 12th Doctor better and the writers are also much more consistent with him. So I can enjoy even trivial episodes, because at least it looks like they’re having fun with it.