herewith the ‘Cats’ trailer, because OMG

I used to post trailers all the time and I don’t post trailers anymore but I have to post this trailer because what the actual fuck.

I… what?

Judi Dench concurs:

Cats Judi Dench

share and enjoy
               
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
subscribe
notify of
25 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
Lennon
Lennon
Fri, Jul 19, 2019 3:41am

It’s Uncanncy Valley: The Movie.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Lennon
Fri, Jul 19, 2019 12:36pm

Uncatty Valley.

Dr. Rocketscience
Dr. Rocketscience
Fri, Jul 19, 2019 3:50am

TIL no one on the Internet™ has ever seen Cats, the 4th longest running musical in history. Because I have seen it, and friends, this is what it looks like.

Danielm80
Danielm80
reply to  Dr. Rocketscience
Fri, Jul 19, 2019 5:21am

The original musical was a little cheesy. The trailer is like being boiled to death in cheese, and then they add even hotter cheese so that your skull turns instantly into liquid.

I have to ask, in all seriousness: Wasn’t there a single adult human being involved in the process, at any point, who said, “It’s not too late to stop this”? But I ask the same question about almost everything that’s happened in the world in the past few years.

Bluejay
Bluejay
reply to  Danielm80
Fri, Jul 19, 2019 11:59am

The trailer is like being boiled to death in cheese, and then they add even hotter cheese so that your skull turns instantly into liquid.

Insert “Game of Thrones Viserys Death” gif here.

Dr. Rocketscience
Dr. Rocketscience
reply to  Danielm80
Fri, Jul 19, 2019 7:18pm

“The original musical was a little cheesy.”

Lol, yeah, no. Cats is beyond cheesy. Cats points and laughs at cheese. At one point in the show, a stage hand tosses a prop representing a shoe, scaled to the height of the actors as cats, onto the stage. The cast looks at it and goes right on singing.

The time for an adult to say “It not too late to stop this” was like 1979. Now, it’s a thing. To look at this and say “Too much” is just missing the anthropomorphic forest for the CGI trees.

I’m likely going to avoid this be cause Cats is a bad musical and Andrew Lloyd Webber should be taken to an alley and beaten for his many sins. Not because Tom Hooper and co. somehow did it wrong in the visuals.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Dr. Rocketscience
Fri, Jul 19, 2019 12:33pm

It isn’t what the stage version looks like, though:
comment image

The cats are a lot more, well, catlike, onstage, and also you see them at a distance, which lends an impressionistic quality to them. Onstage, the actors look like humans in cat makeup. In this trailer, the actors look like the result of some sort of ungodly Frankenstein experiment to meld humans and felines. I find it terrifying. (I’m sure Ian Malcolm would have something to say about the filmmakers thinking too much about whether they *could* achieve this affect, and not enough about whether they *should.*) The cat people in *Doctor Who* look way better, and that was done just with makeup.

comment image

Dr. Rocketscience
Dr. Rocketscience
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Fri, Jul 19, 2019 7:08pm

Isn’t it though?comment image?w=1000&h=563&crop=1comment imagecomment image?w968h681

I dunno, seems of a kind. I’m just shocked to find myself in a position of defending Cats, of all (horrible, ridiculous, inexplicably popular) things, from irony poisoning.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Dr. Rocketscience
Sat, Jul 20, 2019 2:37pm

I see a qualitative difference. I’m sure the filmmakers thought they were making the cats look more “realistic.” I guess there was no one to tell them otherwise.

thomskis
thomskis
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Mon, Jul 29, 2019 5:25pm

Yep. Definitely a good time to break out the overused Ian Malcolm GIF.

Stacy Livitsanis
Stacy Livitsanis
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Tue, Jul 23, 2019 2:39pm

Useless trivia connecting Cats and Doctor Who: Before playing Doctor Who companion Melanie Bush, Bonnie Langford was in the original production of Cats as Rumpleteazer.

Even more useless trivia just about me: I learnt Skimbleshanks, my favourite song from Cats, in Japanese to sing for my teacher for an end-of-year oral test. Having done that, I have more respect for the translators who turned Eliot’s poems into Japanese than the fools making this movie. However it goes, I hope it’s not mediocre. Meaning, if it’s going to be crap, then I want it to be spectacularly crap.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjeC5EYkCys

David_Conner
David_Conner
Fri, Jul 19, 2019 9:26am

Midnight, and the kitties are sleeping,
All alone by the furnace,
Where the birdies are cheeping.

Tonio Kruger
Tonio Kruger
reply to  David_Conner
Wed, Jul 24, 2019 8:56pm

In the room the women come and go.
Talking of Michelangelo.
And also of cats.
But mainly of Michelangelo
Because you know, art…

Bluejay
Bluejay
Fri, Jul 19, 2019 12:16pm

The Lion King and Cats are two different approaches to musicals about animals — or really, musicals about human stories, in animal guise. Lion King opted for photorealism that sacrificed animated expressiveness. Cats is going for CGI-furred but still recognizably human actors, doing human emoting. I was really hoping that this would be the better way.

Now… I want a third option. Did no one consider that Cats would look AMAZING as a traditional 2D animated feature? (The Lion King sure did.) Or if it must be live-action, then bring back practical costumes and effects, please. Ron Perlman’s Vincent in Beauty and the Beast looked MILES better than this.

Oh well. With Hamilton’s choreographer and Les Twins and Francesca Hayward involved, maybe at least there’ll be some good dancing.

David_Conner
David_Conner
reply to  Bluejay
Fri, Jul 19, 2019 7:28pm

What if you took the Lion King “live action” approach?

Actual cat characters acting catlike, doing funny cat stuff, but also singing?

If you made the faces more expressive, I think the Lion King approach might actually work for Cats.

Bluejay
Bluejay
reply to  David_Conner
Fri, Jul 19, 2019 8:07pm

More “humanly” expressive faces on photoreal cat bodies is its own kind of creepy. If you make the faces more expressive, then it’s not photoreal, so there’s no point to the rest of their bodies being photoreal either. Because photoreal images are supposed to fool you into thinking “wow, that’s real!” which doesn’t work when the supposedly real animals aren’t acting like real animals at all. (Which is the problem with The Lion King.)

If you do both cartoonishly expressive CGI animal faces AND bodies together, it can turn out well. In fact, that’s exactly what Disney did themselves, with Zootopia! Cats done in the style of Zootopia would have been absolutely delightful.

As far as humans portraying animals, I think The Little Prince solved the challenge way back in 1974: just start with real animals, then swap them out for human actors at the appropriate times, with zero explanation. I had no problem seeing a snake turn into Bob Fosse, or a fox turn into Gene Wilder. :-)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXonK8EBqmk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkiZuu79N_I

Danielm80
Danielm80
reply to  Bluejay
Fri, Jul 19, 2019 8:34pm

I’m fascinated with Steven Spielberg’s animated version–which was in development for a while back in the 1990s–though mostly because the screenplay was by Tom Stoppard.

https://io9.gizmodo.com/stunning-concept-art-for-spielbergs-animated-cats-movie-1599739506

Bluejay
Bluejay
reply to  Danielm80
Fri, Jul 19, 2019 8:41pm

That concept art looks gorgeous! Ah, what could have been.

bronxbee
bronxbee
reply to  Bluejay
Wed, Jul 24, 2019 8:07pm

wow! loved that film… haven’t seen it in years and i always thought bob fosse was the snake right from the beginning…

Tonio Kruger
Tonio Kruger
reply to  bronxbee
Wed, Jul 24, 2019 8:58pm

Brush up your snakespeare!

Hey, somebody had to say it….

MPC
MPC
Fri, Jul 19, 2019 4:23pm

This is going to give me nightmares in the months to come.

Dr. Rocketscience
Dr. Rocketscience
Fri, Jul 19, 2019 7:39pm

Of the top 12 longest running Broadway musicals, only this, Wicked, and the 1976 revival of Oh! Calcutta! haven’t been adapted into a film (or were based on Disney films). Of those, only Rent and Jersey Boys (and maybe Phantom of the Opera) really tanked at the box office. And Wicked, at one point to be released this December, is currently slated for December 2021.

You could argue that Cats is past its prime – its 2016 revival only ran a year, though it’s currently touring nationally. But I don’t think it’s fair to say that no one wanted this.

MisterBongwater
Fri, Jul 19, 2019 9:07pm

As much as this is more confirmation that Andrew Lloyd Webber is clearly not my thing, I’m getting convinced that this needs to be in the world and needs to be as bananas as possible.

MisterBongwater
reply to  MisterBongwater
Fri, Jul 19, 2019 9:12pm

Added to agree a 2D or 3D animated adaptation would probably be more palatable and I’d be more interested.