at least it has Luke Evans (Fast & Furious 6 trailer)

Mon, Apr 29, 2013

But he’ll probably be completely wasted.

“We talkin’ vehicular warfare.” You know that’s how they pitched this script. Also making certain to reassure the studio that yes, there would be plenty of anonymous female booty gyrating in the camera.

I particularly enjoy the jump cut here from the two chicks beating the crap out of each other to the tank busting out onto the highway. It’s like, “You think you’re gonna get off on this? Well, wait till you see this.”

I hate us sometimes.

share and enjoy

If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)

If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.

PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.

4 Comments

oldest

newest most voted

Inline Feedbacks

view all comments

Paul Wartenberg

Tue, Apr 30, 2013 1:47am

But on the other hand it keeps them off the streets of Albuquerque.

For now…

RogerBW

Tue, Apr 30, 2013 10:12am

Bigger. Faster. Dumber.
Also, more of London getting damaged.
I quite enjoyed the first film. The third one was amusing cheese straight out of the Script-O-Matic 2000. But this…

MPC

Tue, Apr 30, 2013 3:33pm

I’m a guy, and I frankly don’t see the appeal of the “Fast” series. If I want to play ‘smash ’em up’, I’ll break out my Hot Wheels set and mash the cars together like I was 10 years old.

Mate Sršen

Wed, May 01, 2013 11:50pm

I don’t get off on chicks beating the crap out of each other, but I
also don’t dismiss a fight scene out of hand simply because no man is in
it. That particular bit of snark was uncalled for, I think, even if the
rest of your comments are likely true.