question of the day: Has J.J. Abrams lost his mind?
Abrams says he’ll shoot Star Trek 2 in 2D and do a postproduction 3D conversion. The news is like a negative Christmas present for geeks.
Abrams says he’ll shoot Star Trek 2 in 2D and do a postproduction 3D conversion. The news is like a negative Christmas present for geeks.
Want to make manchildren laugh? Blow some weed smoke out at them in 3D. Call something “Avatarded” as a compliment. Get a baby high. Har har.
Surely something called the Boston Molasses Disaster is begging for the Coen Brothers’ treatment, no?
Martin Scorsese made a 3D kids’ movie that’s about movies. That’s about the love of movies. And it’s steampunky and rollicking and features a cool girl character, too. How is it possible that I won’t love this movie?
Spoiler: the boat still sinks in the end.
Did you know that The Hobbit is being shot in 3D? Well, it is.
Did you know there is a new Harold and Kumar movie on its way… just in time to ruin your holidays? Ha ha, ho ho: now you do.
It’s the world’s first Bollywood superhero movie. Of course it’s in 3D.
It is leaden where it should be light. It is graceless and charmless. It reels from the painful banter. It is the epitome of empty soulless corporate filmmaking.
Are we going to see a mad rush by all the studios to convert old — and not so old — movies to 3D and get them back out in multiplexes? Would that be an entirely bad thing? Would it be better if we just got unconverted classics back on a big screen?