Errors of the Human Body review: scientists are people too

Get new reviews via email or app by becoming a paid Substack subscriber or paid Patreon patron.

Errors of the Human body yellow light Michael Eklund

More brooding thinkpiece than sci-fi thriller, and yet fans of brooding thinkpieces may not be wholly satisfied, either.
I’m “biast” (pro): I’m a big ol’ science fiction geek always on the lookout for real SF onscreen

I’m “biast” (con): nothing

(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)

[dropcap style=”font-size: 150px; color: #PIXCOLOR;”]Chop off a salamander’s tail, and it grows a new one. Could there be a dormant gene in human DNA that might be activated in order to allow us to regenerate lost limbs or diseased organs? Canadian researcher Dr. Geoff Burton (the Ethan Hawke-esque Michael Eklund) thinks so, and he arrives at a private lab in Germany to work on the problem with a local former assistant (Karoline Herfurth: The Reader) who may have had a breakthrough. But it’s not just work that has sent Burton far from home: he’s recently divorced after the death of his infant son. Might that death have been prevented by the very discovery the scientist is striving toward? Is that what is leading Burton to do some very odd things and take some very big chances with his work now? Don’t be misled by some of the synopses for this flick that are floating around on the Web: this isn’t a plague-disaster story, and even to call it a medical thriller is straining for a sense of suspense that the film really never achieves. As with so many other indie SF flicks, Errors doesn’t really know quite what to do with its intriguing conceit, once it finally finds it after flailing around for a while. But director and cowriter Eron Sheean creates a moody atmosphere of grief and obsession hanging over Burton — Eklund is a brooding, doleful presence — to highlight the film’s most successful aspect: its technocratic philosophizing, with a particular ironic focus on how even supposedly rational science is achieved only when irrationality is part of the mix. If only the film had taken that notion just a little bit farther.

share and enjoy
               
If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, please reconsider.
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
subscribe
notify of
1 Comment
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
RogerBW
RogerBW
Fri, Jul 12, 2013 3:57pm

A film like this ought to be able to be both thinky and thriller. Gattaca wasn’t bad in that regard. Even The Island had its moments.