Protagonist (review)

Get new reviews via email or app by becoming a paid Substack subscriber or paid Patreon patron.

Jessica Yu’s previous film, the strangely enthralling In the Realms of the Unreal: The Mysterious Life and Art of Henry Darger, challenged concepts of what a documentary can and should accomplish, and she does that again with her latest work. Emerging from an assignment to make a film about the 5th-century BC Greek playwright Euripides, this bold exploration of the writer’s theme of extremism taken to the point of tragedy combines interviews with four men whose lives took a path they never wanted with snippets of the playwright’s works performed by traditional puppets — anonymously masked stand-ins for us all — to create a demanding but rewarding examination of how we are, or are not, in control of our own destinies. Yu, winner of an Oscar for her short documentary “Breathing Lessons: The Life and Work of Mark O’Brien,” draws startlingly self-aware confessions of the loss of self-determination from such diverse men as Hans-Joachim Klein, a former terrorist; Mark Pierpont, an ex-minister and escapee from an “ex-gay” lifestyle; Joe Loya, bank robber turned writer and teacher; and, in the lightest of the life-tales, author Mark Salzman (Yu’s husband), who found himself seduced as an insecure teen into a twisted version of martial arts. The men range in their tellings from funny and buoyant to poignant and stirring; all are wise in the probing analyses of their paths to the confidence and serenity they’ve come to learn. Are we the protagonists in our own life stories? Or do we allow ourselves to be played as puppets by external forces like fear, the expectations of others, and our own unfamiliar desires? Through these men, and through the ancient but still relevant perception of a long-dead writer, we are led to ask these questions of ourselves.

(Technorati tags: , , , , , , )

share and enjoy
             
If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, please reconsider.
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
subscribe
notify of
3 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
JSW
JSW
Tue, Nov 27, 2007 12:13am

This review seems pretty much uniformly positive. Can you elaborate on what flaw(s) you found in the movie that caused you to give it a “Wait for DVD” rating?

MaSch
MaSch
Tue, Nov 27, 2007 3:50am

Hi MaryAnn. This is the first time I post here, I like your reviews, just wanted to hint at Euripides being 5th century B.C. (although I don’t know if “the 5th century B.C. playwright” is an elegant expression). By the way, I wonder about the same thing JSW does.

MaryAnn
MaryAnn
Tue, Nov 27, 2007 2:06pm

There’s no flaw. “Wait for DVD” isn’t necessarily a negative, particularly when a film is near the top of the “yellow” category in the annual ranking (as this one is). In this case, it just means that this film will not in any way be diminished by watching it on a small screen. And also note that “wait for DVD” means “wait unless your favorite actor is in it,” which is the case of a documentary would translate, I think, as “unless you find the subject matter very compelling.” The appeal of this film is limited, but if it appeals to you, consider the light green.

Euripides being 5th century B.C.

Noted and fixed.