George A. Romero’s Diary of the Dead (review)

I hate to say this -- partly because I don’t want it to be true and partly because it’s such a terrible pun -- but could the zombie movie finally be dead? I mean, if the master, George Romero (Land of the Dead) himself, can’t find a truly fresh angle on it, maybe it’s time to give it a rest...? Nah, we’ll just call this a momentary downward blip on the chart. A gang of film students is in the woods shooting a low-budget horror flick when, wouldn’t ya know it, the dead start to come back to life with a hunger for brains. And thanks to our media-savvy Web 2.0 Scooby gang (played by a fresh-faced band of game unknowns), we get to see civilization fall apart as they do: first via the mainstream television news, and later, as the zombie-pocalypse hits hard, via the only ways left to get the word out: YouTube and bloggers. Oh, and the students are also filming themselves trying to survive the end of the world. The Amish interlude is pretty gonzo -- obviously the plain folk will do just fine come the undead holocaust -- but the rest of the flick is a tad too self-conscious about the “importance” of its “message.” (The students’ film teacher actually makes reference to an “underlying thread of social satire,” striking a particularly awkward note.) You can’t really complain that this is too Cloverfield-y without adding anything new to the science-fiction verite genre -- or even coming close to matching that film’s power -- because this was already showing at festivals before that other flick was even completed. But it’s actually a bit too Blair Witch-y, which was long enough in the past that we’d moved well beyond it years ago. Still, the phrase “shoot me” takes on a whole new meaning here, and, oh yeah, Romero got Stephen King and Wes Craven and Simon “Shaun of the Dead” Pegg and other horrormeisters to do voiceovers as newscasters. Hee hee.
(Technorati tags: George Romero, Diary of the Dead)
more below the ad... scroll down...
rated R for strong horror violence and gore, and pervasive language
official site | IMDB



comments
posted by Kate (March 8, 2008 1:22 PM)
I know some people will think this borders on heresy, and I mean no disrespect, but I don't think any of Romero's zombie movies have been good since the first 'Night of the Living Dead.' He's one of the few well-respected, famous horror directors who seems like he's afraid of his own chosen genre or even his own ideas. My impression is that he ends up somehow diluting his own films with campiness or with clunky messages that don't work, or with both. Sorry, George.
posted by Signal30 (March 19, 2008 12:41 AM)
As someone that grew up with Romero as an idol, I don't think you're talking heresy... it just is what it is.
Between the subtext in Night and Dawn, the guy got a rep for being the voice of The Social Satire of Horror, and he took it to heart (sort of like how George Lucas and the whole Campbell "Hero's Journey" buggered up everything on that side of the fence).
Ultimately, that led to the the hamfisted Land (I haven't seen Diary, but it sounds like more of the same... especially that "underlying thread of social satire" line).
I'd like him to go back to keeping the subtext being just that, and leave the yahoos to draw whatever yahoo thing they're gonna get out of it.
posted by Thomason (April 19, 2008 7:50 PM)
It what happens when camp no longer is camp.