question of the day: Why do we continue to be George Lucas’s bitch?We should just take it as a given now that if there’s a new way in which George Lucas can ruin Star Wars, he will proceed with the ruining. Via Cinematical: You may recall that many 'Star Wars' fans were unhappy with the prequels, and that as a consequence of the fans' anger, Episodes I, II, and III are only the 7th, 30th, and 12th highest-grossing films of all time, with a combined worldwide gross of just $2.4 billion. Duly chastened by this catastrophic failure, George Lucas announced Tuesday that those prequels, along with the three original films, will be re-released in 3D. This will fix everything, since the main thing people didn't like about the prequels was that watching them didn't require special glasses. The snark comes courtesy of my buddy Cinematical writer Eric Snider, and I can’t say I disagree with him. Why wouldn’t Lucas rerelease the films again, with another gimmick to drag us all back to the theater to see them? Because we will sigh and moan and huff and complain, but we will plunk down our dollars to see these new versions. Won’t we? And then there’s Charlotte Gore at the U.K.’s Spectator Arts Blog, also letting loose the snark: I've got some bad news for you. Are you sitting down? You may want a stiff drink. George Lucas is about to do something which will make you look back fondly on the Phantom Menace as 'that period when he had artistic integrity'. That's right: The Phantom Menace... 3D. But wait! There's more: Attack of the Clones... 3D. But wait! There's more: The whole stinking, turgid, awful double trilogy is returning to a multiplex near you, and this time it's not just added creatures, but an extra dimension too! It’s funny cuz it’s true. I’ll borrow a phrase from Simon Pegg’s Spaced anti-hero Tim Bisley here and say, “George Lucas, you Lando.” And yet, we will all go see these movies, slated to be released one per year through much of the decade to come. So, the question is: Why do we continue to be George Lucas’s bitch? How do we escape from his Svengali-like domination? (If you have a suggestion for a QOTD, feel free to email me. Responses to this QOTD sent by email will be ignored; please post your responses here.) Disqus commentsblog comments powered by Disqus |
posted:
Thu Sep 30 10, 11:16AM categories: movie buzz talent buzz talk amongst yourselves permalink Disqus comments tip jarshare
read morerelated· AOL/HuffPo shoots the messenger, fires Moviefone editor Patricia Chui over work-for-free email · watch it: American ‘Spaced’ pilot clips · a little bit of David Tennant: ‘Randall & Hopkirk (Deceased)’ · Spaced: The Complete Series (review) · cinematic roots of: ‘Scott Pilgrim vs. the World’ · ‘Doctor Who’ thing of the day: Bill Bailey’s ode to the wonderfulness of the Doctor · question of the day: Has Kevin Smith finally gone mad... or is he brilliant? · question of the day: How do you cope with ‘cinematicus interruptus’? · question of the day: Should ‘Inception’ get a sequel? · question of the day: If it’s okay to worry that ‘Inception’ is too smart, where is the worry about movies that are too stupid? bloggyprevious post: cinematic roots of: ‘The Night Chronicles: Devil’ next post: trailer break: ‘Barry Munday’ |








