If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
subscribe
notify of
3 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
RogerBW
RogerBW
patron
Mon, Feb 08, 2010 5:05am

Re the “dolls”: Grr! Pastels! Roger smash! Or slightly more seriously, use of desaturated colours indicates a level of fear about the sameness and pallor of these people that’s quite worrying, especially as it seems to be justified.

Lisa
Lisa
Mon, Feb 08, 2010 11:52am

we’re as much to blame – people like looking at beautiful things – look at the cover of most female magazines. Didn’t Vogue or some other magazine do a “black” model issue? That’s just a nod towards tokenism. It’s nice that they do it from time to time but it’s never going to be the norm.

bronxbee
Mon, Feb 08, 2010 1:50pm

what makes these pallid little sticks “beautiful”? i happen to like vibrant colours and vivid people… not that i would buy a copy of VF in any event.