question of the day: Can a movie look “too real”?

Hobbit An Unexpected Journey Martin Freeman

By now, perhaps, many of you have seen The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey… and perhaps some of you have seen it in the 48 frames-per-second version (also known as HFR, or high frame rate). There have been complaints that HFR — which delivers a far crisper image than we’ve ever seen in cinema before — makes everything look “too real”: it certainly does lend the impression, in places, that you’re looking not at a simulated image but through a window into a place that actually exists. But is this a problem?
Can a movie look “too real”? Does this matter more when the movie setting is a purely fantastical, invented one? Or is there an overall essence to the idea of The Movies, even if the setting isn’t fantastical, that demands a feeling of unreality?

(If you have a suggestion for a QOTD, feel free to email me. Responses to this QOTD sent by email will be ignored; please post your responses here.)

share and enjoy
               
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
subscribe
notify of
0 Comments
oldest
newest most voted