X-Men: Days of Future Past trailer: timey-whimey

So, Logan is going to be quantum-leaped back in time to bring hope to young Charles Xavier? Maybe they should send someone cheerier instead…

Wait. Logan looks older here. He’s got white in his hair.

xmenoldlogan

So, is this taking place not in the present and the past but the future and the past? Is the war they’re talking about stopping a war that hasn’t happened yet… like maybe the conflict between normals and mutants has gone from cold to hot?

Ooo, Peter Dinklage is in this!

share and enjoy
               
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
subscribe
notify of
12 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
Bluejay
Bluejay
Wed, Oct 30, 2013 12:12pm

Indestructible being with metal skeleton is sent back in time to stop a war before it begins…

[cue Terminator theme]

Scott Mortensen
Scott Mortensen
reply to  Bluejay
Thu, Oct 31, 2013 3:53am

He’d be sent back in time to a body that still has bone claws, though. So not quite as indestructible.

Bluejay
Bluejay
reply to  Scott Mortensen
Thu, Oct 31, 2013 12:04pm

Dammit, you ruined my joke! ;-)

Full disclosure: I haven’t seen the two stand-alone Wolverine films. Do I need to see them to make any sense of the plot in this one?

MisterAntrobus
MisterAntrobus
reply to  Bluejay
Thu, Oct 31, 2013 7:13pm

Very likely not. Especially not the first, which nearly everyone has pretty much disowned.

bronxbee
bronxbee
Wed, Oct 30, 2013 2:36pm

Peter Dinklage *and* Wolverine Hugh Jackman? ’nuff said. i’m there. matter of fact, i’m going to save my seat right now.

MPC
MPC
Wed, Oct 30, 2013 6:09pm

The story itself is an interesting one. In the film, Wolverine is the one that gets transferred back in time, not Kitty Pryde (Ellen Page). Although Singer says that Kitty is the one that enables it to happen… Wolverine is the leading character.

I like how Fox uses this timeline to make this a follow-up to both X3: The Last Stand and X-Men: First Class, even if this piggybacks off The Avengers‘ massive success.

Mate Sršen
Wed, Oct 30, 2013 10:21pm

As has been mentioned, Kitty Pryde is the one who went back in time in the original comicbook’s storyline. It’s predictable but less interesting to send Wolvie back instead.

Dr. Rocketscience
Dr. Rocketscience
reply to  Mate Sršen
Thu, Oct 31, 2013 2:43am

I don’t see how it’s less interesting. The only thing Kitty Pryde is known for in the X-Men movies is for kinda sorta stealing Sookie’s boyfriend and getting called a bitch by Vinnie Jones.

Scott Mortensen
Scott Mortensen
reply to  Mate Sršen
Thu, Oct 31, 2013 3:45am

Hugh Jackman is the more bankable star.
I wish they’d shown the Sentinels in action, as I’m not entirely sold on the preview pics of them untill I see them in motion. But otherwise I think thats an excellent trailer. Probably the best trailer since “The Watchmen” teaser. The music really makes it seem like a very dark film.

Dr. Rocketscience
Dr. Rocketscience
reply to  Scott Mortensen
Thu, Oct 31, 2013 4:02am

Hugh Jackman is the more bankable star.

It’s not just that. Movie audiences are already emotionally invested in Wolverine. They know who he is and what he stands for. By rewriting the story to feature him as the time-traveller rather than Kitty Pryde, you cut 20 minutes of exposition out of your movie.

Scott Mortensen
Scott Mortensen
reply to  Dr. Rocketscience
Thu, Oct 31, 2013 4:51am

Yeah, thats true too. The Avengers certainly cut out a hell of a lot of exposition and origin stories by having the lead in of all the previous Marvel Studios movies.

Though technically ‘The last Stand’ is (unfortunately) the top grossing film in the franchise. So maybe people remember Kitty a bit.

Ide Cyan
Ide Cyan
Fri, Nov 01, 2013 8:02am

FYI, this is the same footage that was shown at Comic-Con and at the Fantasia Film Festival earlier this year.