evening clickbait: Batkid gets his own theme music; Rex Reed hates the nonexistent 3D Hunger Games; the most social-media savvy country; men in ridiculous “sexy” poses

• Can the Batkid story get any more heartwarming? Why, yes — yes, it can. “Batkid Gets His Own Theme Music Thanks To Batman Composer Hans Zimmer” [PopWrapped]

• Rex Reed rails against the 3D Hunger Games, and opts to see Catching Fire in 2D. Minor point: Neither film has been offered in 3D.

This man is paid — we can presume paid very well — to write about movies. Maybe it’s time he stepped aside and made room for someone who is capable of being factual about movies when it’s the facts that are being discussed.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, of course. But no one is entitled to their own facts.

“Up In Smoke: Catching Fire, Second Installment in Hunger Games Trilogy, Is a Tired Rehash” [New York Observer]

• I’m gonna go ahead and presume that my moving here had something to do with this. “UK Is The Most Social Media-Savvy Country In The World [INFOGRAPHIC]” [AllTwitter]

• Why do some people only seem to realize how ridiculous these poses — and the attitude behind them — are when it’s men doing the posing? “Photo Shoot: Men Posing Like Motorcycle Models” [Doublemesh]

motorcyclemen

share and enjoy
             
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll measure. If you’re not a spammer or a troll, your comment will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately.
subscribe
notify of
13 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
cinderkeys
cinderkeys
Thu, Nov 21, 2013 12:46am

Tacked onto the _Observer_ review:

“CORRECTION: An earlier version of this review was unclear, and to some readers implied that the reviewer saw the first Hunger Games movie in 3D. That was not the case. The Observer regrets the ambiguity.”

No mention of how neither movie is even available in 3D, however.

MaryAnn Johanson
MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  cinderkeys
Thu, Nov 21, 2013 10:00am

They also completely eliminated the bit where he says he “opted” to see *Catching Fire* in 2D, as if he were offered another option.

RogerBW
RogerBW
Thu, Nov 21, 2013 1:41pm

The poses are security exploits into the human cognitive system. They bypass much of conscious thought to produce a visceral response.

althea
althea
reply to  RogerBW
Thu, Nov 21, 2013 4:33pm

I’m trying to picture what pictures of men would look like in poses that
said the same things as these women. Not just “Look what a hunk I am”
but “F**k me.” I can’t really do it.

Danielm80
Danielm80
reply to  althea
Thu, Nov 21, 2013 5:28pm

The photo below might count. I honestly don’t know.

I apologize in advance.

http://bmunchausen.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/burt_reynolds3.jpg

Dr. Rocketscience
Dr. Rocketscience
reply to  Danielm80
Fri, Nov 22, 2013 5:55am

Having just finished all the episodes of “Archer” currently available on Netflix, I am highly amused by this picture.

LaSargenta
LaSargenta
reply to  althea
Thu, Nov 21, 2013 5:28pm

Totally NOT SFW site: check out rentboy dot com (it is written out like that so the image doesn’t load…Disqus is too helpful sometimes). There’s loads of pics that are blatantly “f**k me”. Male gaze-appropriate, of course, but, well, that doesn’t put me off. I’m weird like that.

althea
althea
reply to  LaSargenta
Thu, Nov 21, 2013 6:55pm

You and Daniel are right about the intent. But used in the same way as the motorcycle type, what would such pictures sell? And to whom?

LaSargenta
LaSargenta
reply to  althea
Thu, Nov 21, 2013 7:07pm

Well, they wouldn’t be in the same category as the motorcycle thing…it isn’t assumed that the woman fondling the bike is the rider of the bike…she’s more like an accessory for the bike.

OTOH, if, let’s say, the ad was a Tom of Finland pic come-to-life with a bare-chested hunk in leather chaps over some worn denims…the assumption would be that he is the rider of the bike and *you, too* either look like that or fuck that (or both) if you ride the bike. It still is in the context of our society, even though the image would be homoerotic.

Dr. Rocketscience
Dr. Rocketscience
Thu, Nov 21, 2013 7:26pm

Having the men cross dressed ups the ridiculous considerably. Of course, to some me, having the women cross dress would up the sexy factor, so maybe that’s not really an answer.

Rex Reed has always been a fatuous ass. For my entire adult life he’s been my anti-critic: anything he recommends I avoid, any thing he pans I know is worth seeing. Add this 3D thing is a pretty egregious bit of carelessness, on both his part and his editor.* But I’d be careful with the “factual” thing. Just about every film critic I’ve ever read has made some sort of factual error from time to time. It happens, and it’s hardly representative of the problem with Rex Reed.

* Also, I could see that he might have misremembered having seen “The Hunger Games” in 3D. It’s certainly an obvious candidate for a 3D conversion. And that, having misremembered, in his mind he really did “opt” to see “Catching Fire” in 2D, if only by making sure that the screening he saw was not listed as being a 3D presentation.

Sam Charles Norton
Sat, Nov 23, 2013 3:22pm

MaryAnn – I’ve responded to the photo at my own blog: http://elizaphanian.com/?p=5344 I’d be interested to know your thoughts.

Tonio Kruger
Tonio Kruger
Sat, Feb 08, 2014 10:50pm

Rex Reed is still around?

Tonio Kruger
Tonio Kruger
reply to  Tonio Kruger
Sat, Feb 08, 2014 10:51pm

And working? As a film critic?