The Final Member review: collectile dysfunction

MaryAnn’s quick take: The world’s only penis museum is no joke, but there’s plenty funny (and enlightening, and poignant) in this sweet portrait of a man dedicated to completing his life’s work.
I’m “biast” (pro): nothing
I’m “biast” (con): nothing
(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)
Get new reviews in your email in-box or in an app by becoming a paid Substack subscriber or Patreon patron.

A penis museum. Officially, The Icelandic Phallological Museum. When directors Jonah Bekhor and Zach Math made this charming film about its proprietor, Sigurður Hjartarson, the museum was located in the tiny, remote village of Husavik, but it would appear that its stock has risen considerably since The Final Member made its debut at the Hot Docs documentary festival two years ago: the museum now calls Reykjavik home. Which will make it slightly easier for the world to come to this extraordinary place, and meet the man who runs it.

Though Hjartarson admits here that the museum started, in 1974, as a joke, there is nothing in the least bit crude, sniggering, or off-color about this sweet film, just as “there is nothing pornographic there,” Hjartarson assures us about his establishment. (And we can see that there isn’t.) This is a delightful portrait of a marvelous, and marvelously down-to-earth, character in Hjartarson, and of his determination, now that he is getting on in years, to complete his collection before he dies.

You see, the museum has a specimen on display from every mammal that can be found in Iceland… all but one, that is. Hjartarson needs a homo sapiens penis to see his life’s work finished. This is not so easy. While none of the penises on display, from a hamster’s to a whale’s, have come from animals that were killed for the museum or because of the museum, gathering those specimens was nevertheless comparatively simple. With humans, there’s paperwork and — far more trying — personalities to contend with. Hjartarson has two potential human donors lined up: Páll Arason, a legendary Icelandic adventurer and lothario, which would seem to make him doubly a good fit for the collection; and Tom Mitchell, an American who is so inordinately proud of his organ that he sincerely believes it belongs in a museum.

The museum may no longer be a joke, but there’s plenty that’s funny here, from expressions of male vanity to the hilarious phallic souvenirs Hjartarson carves for the museum shop; and plenty enlightening, from discussion of the taboos surrounding Hjartarson’s chosen area of expertise to matters of Icelandic folklore, which dictate a “legal length” for a male member to be appropriately satisfactory to a wife (and which is guiding Hjartarson’s choice for the human penis that will become part of his collection). But this is ultimately a poignant story about one man’s dedication and perseverance in perfecting the unique mark he will leave on the world.

share and enjoy
             
If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, please reconsider.
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll measure. If you’re not a spammer or a troll, your comment will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately.
subscribe
notify of
8 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
LaSargenta
LaSargenta
Sat, Apr 26, 2014 2:30am

I couldn’t get my kid to go when we were in Reykjavik ladt summer. Next time.

None
None
Wed, May 07, 2014 9:06pm

No doubt if this were a Yoni museum, it would be deemed “porn.” I’ve read comments from women about the “Great Wall of Vagina” exhibit, and none of it is positive.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  None
Wed, May 07, 2014 10:25pm

This is not a Yoni museum, and it’s nothing like the Great Wall of Vagina. Which is not pornographic.

Would you care to comment on my review or on the film?

None
None
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Thu, May 08, 2014 5:36am

The Great Wall of Vagina is not pornographic? Wow, I believe you are the first female I’ve heard say that. Women have said The Wall is downright porn because it involves “that” body part. (Yes, they actually refer to it as “that”).

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  None
Thu, May 08, 2014 12:31pm

You need to talk to more women. Or just try googling.

None
None
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Thu, May 08, 2014 2:11pm

I have and that’s why I posted what I did. The praise for the vagina wall was from men. I haven’t seen any praise from women – mostly things like “porn”, “pervert” (towards the artist), “vaginas are ugly”, “why would anyone do this”, etc.

Bluejay
Bluejay
reply to  None
Thu, May 08, 2014 2:44pm

You have? You’ve tried Googling? Because this and this are the first two Google results for “great wall of vagina review.” Try harder.

Also, you’re still not talking about the movie review, or the movie.

Danielm80
Danielm80
reply to  Bluejay
Thu, May 08, 2014 4:49pm

And, in fact, if you look at the comment threads about the Great Wall of Vagina on sites like Jezebel, the Huffington Post (not my favorite site), and the official web page for the exhibit, most of the remarks seem to be extremely positive. Admittedly, I haven’t read through all of the hundreds of comments, but a number of people said things like: This is much more realistic and diverse than the images in porn.

There were some complaints, but most of them said: Technically speaking, it should be called the Great Wall of Vulvas, even if that ruins the pun.