Sex Tape movie review: for shame

Get new reviews in your email in-box or in an app by becoming a paid Substack subscriber or Patreon patron.

Sex Tape yellow light

Color me absolutely astonished that this is genuinely sweet and wholly sex-positive. Unfortunately, it’s also completely unfunny.
I’m “biast” (pro): nothing

I’m “biast” (con): not a fan of what passes for comedy in Hollywood

(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)

Annie (Cameron Diaz: The Other Woman, The Counsellor) and Jay (Jason Segel: This Is the End, The Five-Year Engagement) need to spice up their bedroom time: they’re still madly in love with each other, but their busy lives — including two rambunctious gradeschoolers — have left them just plain physically exhausted. So they decide to video themselves running through all the positions in The Joy of Sex. It works: they have a wonderful night. But a mishap with the Cloud and some iPads that they had given away as gifts — to family, friends, colleagues, and acquaintances — sees the file accidentally distributed to all those other devices. So now they have to get them back before anyone watches their little home movie.

Color me absolutely astonished that a concept apparently fully charged for shaming and juvenile embarrassment over perfectly ordinary human behavior — and between a happily married couple, no less — ends up being as genuinely sweet and as wholly sex-positive as Sex Tape turns out to be. And this is even after some potentially “juicy” opportunities for shaming are set up by the script… like how Annie, who writes a popular mommy blog, worries that the pending sale of her website to a wholesome toy company will be scuttled if she’s seen as less than wholesome herself. I was all ready with a screed about how people seem to forget how mommies become mommies, but happily, I don’t need it. Sex Tape doesn’t ignore the reality of how stupid American culture can be about sex, but it refuses to indulge such snickering immaturity, and uses a few grossout moments not to humiliate people for their normal human sexual peccadilloes but to remind us that, hey, we all do this stuff. I never would have expected anything so humanist, so nice, from a studio comedy about a missing sex tape.

That said, there’s a huge problem here: this comedy simply isn’t funny. The preposterous shenanigans that ensue as Jay and Annie go in search of the iPads are overly strained, as if screenwriters Segel, Nicholas Stoller (Muppets Most Wanted, The Muppets), and Kate Angelo (The Back-up Plan) suddenly realized, as the would-be comedic action finally gets going, that there’s actually nothing humorous here now that they’ve eliminated the usual Hollywood comedy route of humiliation (not that that would have been funny either, of course). Worse than that is the enormous plot hole that is addressed late in the film in a such a way as to suggest, again, that the existence of the hole hadn’t occurred to the writers until well into their project — and the way they attempt to paper over it just tosses the entire movie into complete irrelevance. The story simply shouldn’t have been a story at all… and that’s something to be ashamed about.

The movie’s attitudes are wonderful, though. Next time, maybe someone will combine them with some actual comedy.

share and enjoy
If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, please reconsider.
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
notify of
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
Thu, Sep 04, 2014 6:04pm

Too bad it wasn’t released this week in the US. Might have picked up a box office boost from the unfortunate timeliness of its premise.

Thu, Sep 04, 2014 8:27pm

Did you notice the big plot hole regarding the casting as well?

According to the movie, they met in college. This means that both husband and wife would be approximately the same age when they met (about 20). However, Cameron Diaz is nine years older than Jason Segel in real life. This means that, when Diaz was 20, Segel would have been 11. Or, if Segel were 20, Diaz would have been a 29-year-old full-time college student (yeah, right).

reply to  rick
Thu, Sep 04, 2014 9:01pm

Eh, there’ve been enough movies with an older man and a younger woman that it’s somewhat commendable to reverse it. It’s not the first time someone has played a different age than they really are; Harrison Ford is only twelve years younger than his “father” Sean Connery.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  rick
Thu, Sep 04, 2014 9:05pm

People do go to college in their late 20s. Or perhaps she’s playing younger or he’s playing older. Either way works — they don’t look like there’s a large gap in their ages.

Tonio Kruger
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Fri, Sep 05, 2014 8:34pm

People do go to college in their late 20s.

Been there, done that. And even then, there were people in my class who were even older than me — including some senior citizens. Of course, this tends to happen more often at community colleges but still it does happen.

What a darn shame they never made a TV show about a college class like that…

reply to  rick
Thu, Sep 04, 2014 10:06pm

Diaz would have been a 29-year-old full-time college student (yeah, right).

*cough* It can happen. Sometimes it takes that long to really figure out what one wants to study and get the money together to do it without going into debt.

Mon, Sep 08, 2014 12:13pm

I think this is the most positive thing I’ve seen anyone say about this film. (To be fair, most of the comments have been along the lines of “really, the Internet doesn’t work like that.”)