more by MaryAnn

even my henchmen think I’m crazy | by maryann johanson

Austenland review: bomb and bombasticity

25 Flares Twitter 15 Facebook 8 Google+ 2 StumbleUpon 0 Email -- 25 Flares ×

Austenland red light Keri Russell

Austenland, allow me to tell you how ardently I loathe and despise you.
I’m “biast” (pro): nothing

I’m “biast” (con): the trailer looked dire

I have not read the source material

(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)

Jane Austen would be appalled. Certainly Darcy would have a glare of withering disdain for all involved. And I don’t get how Austen fans — both within the narrative and watching from the outside — are supposed to find this enlightening or amusing. American Jane (Keri Russell: Extraordinary Measures) is so obsessed with Austen’s novels that she plunks down her entire life savings to travel to Austenland in England, which is meant to be an immersive Regency-era experience — sort of like those murder-mystery weekend things — and then makes no attempt whatsoever to engage with the scenario. This appears not to be because the place is like an Epcot Austen full of bad actors there to “woo” the guests (who are exclusively female) by apparently vying to be mistaken for all the horrible men in Austen’s books. And it’s not because the horrid woman who runs the place (Jane Seymour: Wedding Crashers) is an abusive witch who expels guests for using era-inappropriate cell phones but has them hot-glue-gunning feathers to hats, for some reason, and also allows the actors to behave in weirdly anachronistic ways. It’s because Jane literally cannot distinguish between the fantasy they’re all engaging in, however awkwardly and unconvincingly, and the reality of the bad acting and theme-park setting: she gets actually, properly angry with the Darcy actor (JJ Feild: Captain America: The First Avenger) for his perfectly appropriate Darcy-esque putdowns. Maybe that’s meant to be part of the comedy; maybe that’s meant to be part of the romance — no one seems to know. Certainly not screenwriters Jerusha Hess (who also directs) and Shannon Hale (working from her novel [Amazon U.S.] [Amazon Canada] [Amazon U.K.]). Nothing works here: not the attempted satire on all-consuming fandom, which is cheap and lazy, and certainly not the romance shoehorned in around it, which is horrendously implausible. Hess and Hale don’t seem to like their characters much, if the cruelty and stupidity that has been concocted for them is any measure, and so they are impossible for us to like. (“Are you breaking up with me?” is not something a grown woman says to a man she met the day before, no matter what they’ve done in the interim.) It’s all hugely insulting to women. And to men. And to Austen, and to people who love to read, and to fandom, and to fantasy. Austenland, allow me to tell you how ardently I loathe and despise you.

subscribe to Movie Cheat Sheet and get two emails per week with cineplex and at-home movie recommendations (free to FlickFilosopher.com subscribers)
Region 1
release date:

Feb 11 2014
Amazon US DVD
Amazon US VOD
Amazon Can DVD
Region 2
release date:

Feb 3 2014
Amazon UK DVD
US/Canada release date: Aug 16 2013 | UK release date: Sep 27 2013

Flick Filosopher Real Rating: rated BED: book ’em, Darcy
MPAA: rated PG-13 for some suggestive content and innuendo
BBFC: rated 12A (contains one use of moderate language)

viewed in 2D
viewed at a private screening with an audience of critics

official site | IMDb | trailer
more reviews: Movie Review Query Engine | Rotten Tomatoes
  • RogerBW

    But apart from that, Ms Johansen…?

    It’s odd that this should be a book adaptation. This level of inconsistency smells of a script that’s been hacked about from one genre to another, with bits of the original poking through the hastily-patched skin.

  • http://www.flickfilosopher.com/ MaryAnn Johanson

    I suspect the book isn’t very good…

  • Greyhound

    I’ve read it. It’s not.

  • Emily ann

    the film was completely horrible and the book is light material.
    I think that women are entertained by this film and book perhaps because we enjoy seeing light comedy set in the 1800′s, in lush green England – - as there are so few films out that aren’t horror or torture films esp. against women. Life is tought and draining and light films are the Yin to all that Yang!

  • http://www.flickfilosopher.com/ MaryAnn Johanson

    Er, you realize this isn’t set in the 1800s, don’t you?

  • lescarr

    For those in London, can I recommend Austentatious, a comedy improv group specialising in dramatic reconstructions of as-yet-unseen Jane Austen works. With a live cello accompaniment. Highly regarded. http://austentatiousimpro.com/shows/

25 Flares Twitter 15 Facebook 8 Google+ 2 StumbleUpon 0 Email -- 25 Flares ×