Good (review)

Get new reviews via email or app by becoming a paid Substack subscriber or paid Patreon patron.

No actor has ever looked less comfortable in a Nazi uniform than Viggo Mortensen does in this tepid morality play (based on the stage play by C.P. Taylor) about ethics, wisdom, and how readily some otherwise intelligent and upright people can dispose of them. Good thing it’s thematically appropriate that Mortensen’s John Halder is uneasy wearing the swastika — too bad the moment when the mild-mannered literature professor of 1930s Germany dons the uniform for the first time, near the end of the film, is one of the few moments of real feeling to be found here. The film lets Halder, the epitome of the “good” people who do nothing and so allow evil to thrive, travel from “Hitler is a joke, he’ll never last” to “I never thought it would come to this” with a docility that should underline the effortlessness with which men like Halder could ignore the little voice of conscience in their head telling them they were giving in to wrong, but instead it seems to suck all emotion out of the film. In aiming for subtlety and finely shaded grays, Good gets washed out. Still, Mortensen’s (Eastern Promises) performance is very fine indeed, and there are a few stinging zings: one is an ironic tribute to the fanatical recordkeeping of Nazis, and the other is the final scene of the film, when Halder at last recognizes the evil all around him, and retreats to a place inside himself that, we wonder, he may never escape.

share and enjoy
               
If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, please reconsider.
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
subscribe
notify of
3 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
Janet Davis
Janet Davis
Sun, Jan 04, 2009 4:32am

“I never thought it would come to this” with a docility that should underline the effortlessness with which men like Halder could ignore the little voice of conscience in their head.”

Well, DUH, junior.
This isn’t just the crux of the film; It’s the whole effing point. That he DIDN’T see it coming. That he was so academically smart, yet so naive and passive to the growing political movement around him, that he didn’t perceive its’ having any danger or lasting impact until it was too late. (Remind you of anyone?)
A lot of struggling middle and upper class Germans gained tremendously from Hitler’s rise, and there wasn’t this initial fear of violence from Naziism to begin with. (Remind you of anyone?)
Or are you watching history with your 20/20 glasses? Pretty arrogant…
And once they figured it out, if their own character were as weak as Halder’s, it was too late to renege their opinions, or sneak out of town.
To point out that this was the FAILURE of the film is to admit that you fail to understand people, or history.
This IS the cautionary tale, but told in the same slow and maddening process as life itself. There is a time to be passive, and a time to act. Halder chose to remain passive, hoping that the growing madness would resolve itself without HIS having to do anything about it. (Remind you of anyone?)
Only my take on it, of course. Just saying…

shoop
shoop
Sun, Jan 04, 2009 9:53am

Haven’t seen the movie yet, although I have read the play. I don’t think MA missed the point; I think she was saying that once the movie had made its point, it somehow should have had more of an emotional impact. I DO think, however, that it’s a good movie to see for someone who can so chipperly say, “Hey, I totally would have been fighting to bring those Nazi bastards down.” Yeah, maybe you would have; that’s what a lot of “good” people would say. And maybe not–because that’s just what a lot of “good” people didn’t do.

MaryAnn
MaryAnn
Sun, Jan 04, 2009 11:34am

*Valkyrie* is a completely different kind of film from this one, and hence my review of that film is written in a completely different tone: yes, a chipper one.

A lot of struggling middle and upper class Germans gained tremendously from Hitler’s rise, and there wasn’t this initial fear of violence from Naziism to begin with. (Remind you of anyone?)

Yes, Janet: It reminds me very much of the American people of the last eight years (not that struggling Americans actually have done better, but they’ve been able to pretend that they have as they piled on their debt), as I’m sure is the point you’re trying to make. And in those last eight years, I’ve been one of those people other people look at like I’m crazy when I’ve talked about lost civil liberties and illegal wars and corporate hegemony. It’s been frustrating, and even now most people cannot see what I and other people like me have been saying.

So thanks for the condescension, but I think I do know what I’m talking about when I say I’d like to see some more emotion in a story that is not merely about matters intellectual.