The Other Guys movie review: cops and bunglers

Get new reviews in your email in-box or in an app by becoming a paid Substack subscriber or Patreon patron.

Dammit, now I’m gonna have to see Anchorman again. Because I hated that first collaboration between director-screenwriter Adam McKay and screenwriter-star Will Ferrell. But I loved their Step Brothers and Talladega Nights. And now I love their The Other Guys. Could it be that they just hadn’t yet hit a stride that worked for me with that first project? Or did I miss something?

I’ll get to Anchorman again. For now, I am marveling in how McKay manages to get the tone just right in Guys in a way that other similar movies do not. There’s no phony sentiment crashing in here in the third act turning big puppy dog eyes on you, hoping you’ll suddenly feel for the cartoon characters we’ve been running around with for an hour and a half. It’s all absurd and overblown and — most importantly — consistently so through to the end. And yet, without having to try, it does end up being sorta unexpectedly sweet, too — like how Looney Tunes never had to ask you feel a genuine emotion for Daffy Duck getting his explosive comeuppance, but sometimes you did anyway, just as a sneaky side effect.

Guys isn’t only a parody of buddy cop movies, it’s a parody of male aggression both as it plays out in action movies and as how it plays out in real life. The entire NYPD here lives in the shadow of two hero cops played with over-the-top glee by Samuel L. Jackson (Iron Man 2, Astro Boy) and Dwayne Johnson (Tooth Fairy, Planet 51), whom we are introduced to in an opening sequence that is one of the funniest bits of action comedy I’ve ever seen… which is all the funnier because it’s really not all that extreme an extrapolation from the typical slam-bang action opener (as you’ll see when The Expendables opens next week.) But then we cut almost instantly to a counseling session for officers who have fired their guns in the line of duty… and the joke is not that the regular cops who fire their guns — which is a rarity in the real NYPD — might need counseling but the contrast between real police work and how movies depict it. (Jackson and Johnson, needless to say, expend more bullets in that one opening scene than the entire actual NYPD fires in the line of duty in probably ten years. And they don’t have to go for counseling afterward.)

But then the joke jumps to a new level, by introducing Detective Terry Hoitz (Mark Wahlberg: Max Payne, The Happening), who is on a sort of punishment duty because he fired his gun in the line of duty for what turned out to be a really bad wrong reason, and one that he can’t live down. Now he’s stuck with a partner in Allen Gamble (Will Ferrell: The Goods: Live Hard, Sell Hard, Land of the Lost), formerly a forensic accountant for the NYPD who loves the paperwork aspect of the job most of all. They can’t stand each other — and no one else in the squad room, up to and including their captain (Michael Keaton [Toy Story 3, Post Grad], who hasn’t been this funny in a long time), can stand Allen, either — but Gamble holds his own in surprising and hilarious ways. There’s an argument between the two partners about how a tuna fish might fight a lion that is funny and ridiculous but oddly logical, and is one of the cleverest comeback insults I’ve heard in ages.

Ferrell isn’t actually credited as a screenwriter here; McKay and Chris Henchy have that honor (Henchy wrote the dreadful Ferrell vehicle Land of Lost, which makes the wittiness of Guys’ script even more startling). And they just keep one-upping themselves, from Steve Coogan’s (Marmaduke, Percy Jackson & the Olympians: The Lightning Thief) cowardly financier, who becomes the focus of a case Hoitz and Gamble stumble into and how he distracts the cops from their investigation, to the outrageous backstories they invent for their characters. They hit spot-on the clichés of the genre, from the etiquette of cop funerals to the singing of a mournful Celtic ballad in an Irish pub. (The lyrics are even funnier if you know how tragic such ballads typically are.)

The cast is perfect, underplaying rather than overexaggerating (even Ferrell, who isn’t generally known for his onscreen subtlety). When Gamble, in one chase sequence, laments, “I feel like it’s not fair that they have a helicopter,” and he’s got only a Prius, I nearly choked laughing, because while the line is funny enough, Ferrell’s distressed delivery is even funnier. And the extended joke about Gamble’s “plain” wife who is actually a mega hottie (Eva Mendes: The Spirit, The Women) may go on a bit too long, but lonely Hoitz’s reaction to her isn’t cartoonish eye-bulging but a longing sigh of “You’re a nice lady.” Wahlberg’s smitten awe turns what could have been dirty into something sweetly naughty.

Not every bit works, but even the bits that don’t fail honestly, not out of overstretching desperation on the part of the filmmakers to make you laugh. And those moments get dropped, and the film moves on the next funny bit. There’s even an SEC joke that works.

share and enjoy
If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, please reconsider.
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll measure. If you’re not a spammer or a troll, your comment will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately.
notify of
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
Fri, Aug 06, 2010 4:29pm

Anchorman is much funnier the second time around, especially now that most of the cast is recognizable, as many weren’t as notable back then.

Fri, Aug 06, 2010 4:36pm

Just watched this; your review is spot on… I was just upset that so many of the really good bits were spoiled by the marketing. Pretty much every funny thing you singled out is either telegraphed or shown explicitly in the trailers.

Fri, Aug 06, 2010 4:38pm

**mild spoiler**

Though I must admit, I laughed my ass off at where Sam Jackson and The Rock ended up by the end of the movie.

Fri, Aug 06, 2010 7:20pm

I was just upset that so many of the really good bits were spoiled by the marketing. Pretty much every funny thing you singled out is either telegraphed or shown explicitly in the trailers.

I was surprised how much isn’t spoilable, because the humor isn’t so much about punchlines but about character.

Some stuff is a little spoiled, though, yeah.

But Sam Jackson and The Rock: How the other characters relate to them and the part they have to play in this story I have not seen any hint of anywhere.

Tyler Foster
Sat, Aug 07, 2010 3:59pm

This movie is just so out there that I can’t believe Sony read the script. I think they just heard “McKay, Ferrell, Wahlberg, buddy-cop comedy” and that was it, it was on the summer schedule.

Even the movie’s credits are great. No spoilers. Just don’t get up when the movie’s over.

Sat, Aug 07, 2010 4:58pm

@Tyler: Farrell and McKay had some difficulty selling this movie. Originally, they were working with Warner brothers who balkked at the budget. WB decided to do it on the cheap with Bruce Willis and Tracy Morgain in the starring roles and we see how that turned out.

@MAJ: Given that the bulk of your Anchorman review is devoted to the Anchorman trailer, I’d be very interested in how you respond to the movie in a context outside of its marketing.

Tyler Foster
Sat, Aug 07, 2010 5:26pm

@Parrish I’m guessing that was a joke, but my understanding is that the screenplay for A Couple of Dicks (later Cop Out) was on The Black List of best unproduced screenplays for some time. I think it got watered down significantly when WB greenlit it (Smith is to blame for many things wrong with the film, such as the mediocre direction and casting of Tracy Morgan, but I’m going to give him the benefit of the doubt on the seemingly de-fanged script).

Sun, Aug 08, 2010 10:23am

Anchorman is depressingly sexist (even moreso when it thinks it’s being progressive), but occasionally funny. That’s not the case with this movie which is oddly respectful of women and consistently funny. The thing that keeps it from actually being good is tempo. The plot is not strong enough to hold the goofiness together, so it can never develop any lasting momentum. Because the characters are so one-note, there’s no emotional momentum from scene to scene either. Ferrell and Wahlberg have great comic chemistry, and I hope they work together again, but this is just a series of amusing scenes crudely stitched together that flow at the roughly same speed for the entire running length. However, the shark vs.tuna scene is funnier (both on its own and as a satire of the kinds of discussions “macho” men have with each other) than anything I’ve seen in any comedy I’ve seen since Talladega Nights, which is ultimately the superior movie (I couldn’t make it all the way through Step Brothers).

Sun, Aug 08, 2010 3:07pm

Lion vs. tuna, I mean. (so ridiculous my fingers can’t type it)

Sun, Aug 08, 2010 4:33pm

If it’s a joke, then Kevin is the one who told it and I didn’t catch the punchline. He talks about it here ( starting at around 4:30.

Mon, Aug 09, 2010 12:28pm

MaryAnn (Fri Aug 06 10, 7:20PM):

I was surprised how much isn’t spoilable, because the humor isn’t so much about punchlines but about character.

Actually, the more I think back on The Other Guys, the better I feel about it. I mean, even the stuff that was spoiled in the trailers was hilarious — I just get upset when it feels like I’m watching the film for the second time when it’s only the first. Of course, these McKay / Farrell movies only benefit from repeat-viewing, so now that I can step back from my initial disappointment, it all gets much better.