Cartel Land documentary review: the war on drugs can have no winners

Get new reviews in your email in-box or in an app by becoming a paid Substack subscriber or Patreon patron.

Cartel Land green light

A real-life action thriller, a terrifying companion piece to Sicario. Do we want the wild West in the 21st century? Because that’s what we’ve got.
I’m “biast” (pro): not a fan of the war on drugs

I’m “biast” (con): nothing

(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)

Like a real-life action thriller… and a terrific, and terrifying, companion piece to Sicario. That’s Cartel Land, in which documentarian Matthew Heineman goes in deep behind the blurred lines of the “war on drugs” as it plays out over the U.S.–Mexican border. On the U.S. side, he follows military vet Tim “Nailer” Foley and his self-styled “nongovernmental organization” Arizona Border Recon — one gets the sense this is a man who was bored with civilian life and wanted back into the action — who declares that the group is there to “uphold the law where there is no law.” On the Mexican side, Heineman introduces us to Dr. Jose Mireles, “El Doctor,” who leads the citizens’ militia Autodefensas: Foley might be playing soldier — and, much uglier, proud race warrior protecting white purity from all the brown people pouring over the border — but it really is a matter of life and death for Mireles: the cartels murder indiscriminately to protect their profits. The men on both sides of the border insist that their governments are useless to stop the cartels, and indeed, we do see the Mexican police as little more than partners with the cartels. (The big issue in America is all the users, ie, paying customers.) But as this harrowing slow-burn of a film demonstrates, even the nominal heroes of this saga turn out to be terrible, not just interestingly flawed as we might expect of any human being, but subject to unique brands of wrongdoing, operating outside not only laws of juridprudence but laws of ethics and morality, too. (Is there a hint here that the prospect of legalizing currently illegal drugs, which would end the cartels’ reign of terror, would be opposed by Autodefensas because it would cut into their power? You better believe it.) If there is one underlying takeaway from this depressing but essential movie, it’s that current legal policies on drugs are a complete disaster with absolutely no upside, except to create a path for weak, corrupt men to build fiefdoms of local power. Do we want the wild West in the 21st century? Because that’s what we’ve got.

See also my #WhereAreTheWomen rating of Cartel Land for its representation of girls and women.

share and enjoy
If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, please reconsider.
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
notify of
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
Wed, Feb 17, 2016 1:11pm

And they are the winners. Along with law enforcement agencies that get big budgets for “fighting drugs”. And of course the drug producers and sellers, whose margins wouldn’t be anything like that high without the illegality.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  RogerBW
Wed, Feb 17, 2016 11:07pm

Profiteers. Not winners.

Sun, Feb 21, 2016 6:12am

You thought Nailer was “bored and wanted to get back in the action”? You either slept during parts of the movie or went to the snack bar a few too many times. Maybe you need to watch the film again and reconsider your assumptions.