Clash (Eshtebak) movie review: the view from inside social upheaval

Get new reviews in your email in-box or in an app by becoming a paid Substack subscriber or Patreon patron.

Clash yellow light

MaryAnn’s quick take…

Challenging and provocative, but the limitations it places on itself restrict the appreciation for anyone not already steeped in its culture and politics.tweet
I’m “biast” (pro): nothing
I’m “biast” (con): nothing
(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)

This is the movie that is set entirely in the back of a police van.tweet If you hadn’t already heard about Clash, which premiered at Cannes last year and has had an impressive festival run, I promise that you will be hearing more. This second feature from Egyptian writer (with Khaled Diab) and director Mohamed Diab limits itself in daring way, attacks its intriguing concept unflinchingly,tweet sets a high bar for itself, and ends up as a challenging and provocative bit of cinema. I’m just not sure that it’s entirely successful for those of us who don’t live day to day with the political and cultural upheaval Egypt has been enduring, who aren’t steeped in the minutiae of the social situation.

Set in summer 2013, after the Egyptian army ousted Muslim Brotherhood president Mohamed Morsi, Clash follows a day of turmoil in Cairo as protesters on both sides of the conflict, as well as journalists and innocent bystanders, are sweep into the van and then are delayed on their way to jail by ongoing riots and unrest in the city, which they witness only through the small windows of the van (which frustratingly restricts our understanding of what is happening). Tempers would flare at the best of times, but the metal box of a vehicle is stiflingly hot and the cops refuse to give the prisoners water, so breaking points are reached pretty quickly.

The view -- the only view -- from Clash...
The view — the only view — from Clashtweet

I like the common ground that Diab allows some of the protesters on either side to find with one another, at least temporarily, and I appreciate the point made by the presence of characters who are inflexible: they are the ones prolonging the larger battle, probably. The humor of those who are apolitical — like the young hipster who’s mostly concerned about how his hair is holding up in the heat — seems to represent a fairly universal human reality, that even at times of immense struggle, most people are little more than disinterested onlookers who just wish everything would settle down one way or another. But it seems as if in 97 minutes of runtime with nothing for these characters to do but talk to one another, they would be more than just briefly sketched as people. Or perhaps — very likely, in fact — there are nuances at work that outsiders like me simply cannot grasp.tweet Maybe it’s too much to expect more from a film that is intended as a moment in time, not a geopolitical lesson, but for the likes of me, something essential was missing.

share and enjoy
If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, please reconsider.
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll measure. If you’re not a spammer or a troll, your comment will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately.
notify of
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments