Welcome to Marwen movie review: toying with our sympathy

Get new reviews via email or app by becoming a paid Substack subscriber or paid Patreon patron.

Welcome to Marwen yellow light

MaryAnn’s quick take…

The plastic terror of The Polar Express melded with the kooky charm of Forrest Gump is a bad, sometimes outright icky, way to tell a tale of trauma and recovery, and does a disservice to Steve Carell’s sensitive performance.tweet
I’m “biast” (pro): love Steve Carell
I’m “biast” (con): hot and cold on Robert Zemeckis
(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)
women’s participation in this film
male director, female coscreenwriter, male protagonist
(learn more about this)

I haven’t seen the 2010 documentary Marwencol, and now I have to, because I feel like it surely must do a better job of telling the true story of artist Mark Hogancamp than Welcome to Marwen does. The problem isn’t that deeply internal, intensely psychological reality has been fictionalized in a visual medium, per se, though that was always going to be a difficult task. It’s the way that it has been fictionalized. It’s been… Zemeckis-ized. This is directed by Robert Zemeckis (Allied, The Walk), after all, and cowritten by him and Caroline Thompson (Corpse Bride, The Nightmare Before Christmas). But he’s at his most Zemeckis-y, as if he imagined, for some reason, that the plastic terror of The Polar Express melded with the kooky charm of Forrest Gump would somehow work to tell a tale of trauma and recovery, of the power of imagination to help and to heal. It doesn’t.

The horror that Hogancamp experienced and the ways he found to cope with it might have been better served with the kind of restraint that Zemeckis showed with his Contact — a small, beautiful story about the hugeness of the universe — or in Cast Away, which rendered an extreme of human experience and survival with exquisite humor and pathos. You see, Hogancamp (here portrayed by Steve Carell: Beautiful Boy, Battle of the Sexes) barely survived a sickening beating by five especially vicious attackers, and he was left with terrible losses, in his memory and in his physical capabilities. He could no longer draw, so as part of his recovery, as a sort of self-devised art therapy, he constructed in his yard a scale-model WWII-era Belgian town, which he dubbed Marwen, and began photographing its inhabitants — dolls, GI Joe and Barbie types — in an ongoing story about, well, violence and trauma and rescue and magic and endurance.

Welcome to Marwen Steve Carell
“Dude, if I have to ask you one more time to sit still…”

You can see at the real Mark Hogancamp’s web site about his project that the dolls are just… dolls. They have generic doll faces. They are, however, analogs for people in Hogancamp’s life, including his attackers (they’re the Nazis)… and the way Zemeckis has chosen to represent that is to give the dolls the actual visages of his cast: Hogancamp’s stand-in looks like Carell; that of a woman Hogancamp met at rehab who inspired him looks like Janelle Monáe (Hidden Figures, Moonlight); the surrogate for his home carer looks like Gwendoline Christie (The Darkest Minds, Star Wars: The Last Jedi); other dolls look exactly like extruded-plastic versions of Hogancamp’s new neighbor (Leslie Mann: Blockers, How to Be Single); a colleague (Eiza González: Baby Driver, Jem and the Holograms) at the restaurant where he works; and an employee (Merritt Wever: Birdman, Righteous Kill) at the hobby shop where he buys his dolls and small-scale accessories. (One doll, a 3,000-year-old witch who torments Marwen, is “played” by Diane Kruger [Fathers & Daughters, Disorder]. Hogancamp says he doesn’t know where this character comes from.) And while the real Hogancamp’s stories exist in concrete form only as still photos, Zemeckis has chosen to animate them.

Welcome to Marwen is too often uncomfortably like peering in on daydreams that should have remained private.
tweet

Perhaps this seemed like a good way to bring to life the fantasy that allows Hogancamp control over the uncontrollable, some measure of mastery over horrors too acute to confront in any other way. But what it means is that half of Welcome to Marwen — all the CGI-animated bits — are fantasies that have no resonance for us, even if we can clearly appreciate, in a purely intellectual way, their appeal for Hogancamp. But for us they are like looking at someone else’s very personal porn, often almost literally: the dolls are absurd delusions of sexiness and dominance, scantily clad and constantly rescuing the Hogancamp doll, which is much more naturalistic looking, at least compared to the women. It’s a bit like a wide-awake Wizard of Oz — “you were there, and you” — but without much of a narrative in the dreamlike sections. The fantasy bits don’t speak to us at all; they don’t speak to anyone but Hogancamp. They don’t connect to larger notions of the power of story. They are too uncomfortably like peering in on daydreams that should have remained private.

Ironically, there’s an element of Hogancamp’s story that could have been depicted in a salacious way: he has a thing for women’s shoes, the more feminine, the better; stilettos seem to hold a particular fascination for him. (A mention of the fact that he sometimes likes to wear women’s shoes seems to be what prompted his attackers to target him.) Zemeckis treats this in a completely straightforward, totally casual way, like the not-at-all-unusual thing it is. Which is great. Instead, the animated sequences are where the fetishizing is happening: dolls that look like real women yet also like impossibly unrealistic playthings, dressed in fishnet stockings and other attire less than practical for a war zone, and sometimes exposing their plastic breasts. (One doll is an analog for Hogancamp’s favorite actress… who is a porn star. Zemeckis cast his wife, Leslie, in this role, which adds another layer of ick.)

Welcome to Marwen sexy dolls
Toy Story was never this va-va-voom…

I’m sure this is all offered to us with the best of intentions… but it is by turns forced, overenunciated, absurdly on the nose, and sometimes is so lost in the fantasy world that it forgets to clue us in to what’s really going on with Hogancamp. Something about an addiction to unidentified pills, for instance, suddenly turns up in the last few minutes of the movie, and we have no idea what that’s about: Hogancamp hadn’t seemed to be suffering in that sense.

Carell’s performance ends up being pretty much the only reason to see Welcome to Marwen. There’s a delicate sensitivity to how he shows us the hangover Hogancamp is left with after his trauma, one that is undoubtedly masculine in shape, in how it’s about being unable to directly deal with his emotions, and in the horny-straight-guy expression it takes. His tenderness with himself, inarticulate though it may be, becomes a sharp contrast to the cruelty he endured at the hands of other men. It’s too bad the rest of the movie doesn’t know how to support him in that.


Documentary Marwencol is available on a new Special Edition DVD in Region 1 [Amazon US] and also on iTunes [iTunes US] [iTunes UK]. It is also available to stream in the US on Kanopy.



share and enjoy
               
If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, please reconsider.
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
subscribe
notify of
11 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
Isabelle May
Isabelle May
Wed, Dec 19, 2018 10:36pm

If they were that set on animating the dolls, they almost would have been better off getting someone like Dino Stamatopoulos in to stop-motion animate it a la Anomalisa. Oh well.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Isabelle May
Thu, Dec 20, 2018 2:53pm

I think they probably should not have animated the dolls at all.

Beowulf
Beowulf
Thu, Dec 20, 2018 2:03pm

Shoot! I was looking forward to this. The Wolf, man.

Lucy Gillam
Fri, Dec 21, 2018 5:53pm

The real Hogancamp doesn’t just like women’s shoes. He’s a crossdresser (or at least, it was my impression in the documentary that he was not actually trans*; he definitely does speak about wanting to wear a skirt to the opening of the exhibit of his photos, and he does one scene of the girl dolls helping his stand-in put on stockings), and it really disappoints me that they watered that down. I wondered if they would, or even eliminate it altogether. I’m also confused as to why they changed the name of the town from Marwencol to Marwen (possibly the real Colleen expressed a preference, there). I am bummed, though, because the documentary was so good.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Lucy Gillam
Tue, Dec 25, 2018 9:08am

Can’t find the link now, but apparently the shoe thing has been a real turnoff for significant numbers of audience members. :-(

Not a spoiler, but by the end of the film, he has added “col” to the end of “Marwen,” but not inspired by someone named Colleen. So I would guess that there may have been issues with getting some real people’s permission to fictionalize their part of this story.

Lucy Gillam
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Wed, Dec 26, 2018 2:03am

That’s disappointing :(. I mean, the man was permanently disabled for something as inconsequential as how he likes to dress, and moviegoers can’t handle even a slice of that?

And yeah, that makes sense.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Lucy Gillam
Sat, Dec 29, 2018 8:31am

We are a petty and immature people.

Tonio Kruger
Tonio Kruger
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Sat, Dec 29, 2018 3:17pm

But we can be a great people as well. Marlon Brando said so in that Superman movie.:-)

On the plus side, I can’t help comparing the trailer for this flick to the trailer for a much older film I remember that also involved a male artist who was a victim of a hate crime. Guess which differences stand out and which can’t be explained by the fact that one movie was inspired by a documentary and the other by a fictional character?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrRl2QQKkI8

Paul Wartenberg
Sat, Dec 22, 2018 9:04pm

why did they make a fictional movie for a documentary that didn’t need fictionalizing?!

dammit Hollywood, this isn’t how to get more creative.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Paul Wartenberg
Tue, Dec 25, 2018 9:26am

Because it’s a critically praised, multi-award-winning film that is rated highly by audiences who have seen it, but those audiences are tiny: the film was released only in the US and earned only $112,036. So it’s a story with proven appeal that Hollywood tried to expand the appeal of. If the fictionalized worked, we wouldn’t mind any of this, I suspect.

MaryAnn Johanson
Thu, Jan 03, 2019 9:34pm

That would be *Sand Pirates of the Sahara,* one of my all-time favorite movies: https://www.flickfilosopher.com/2006/07/sand-pirates-of-the-sahara-review.html