Frank & Lola movie review: the pain of men (it’s all women’s fault)

Get new reviews in your email in-box or in an app by becoming a paid Substack subscriber or Patreon patron.

Frank and Lola red light

MaryAnn’s quick take…

Ridiculous coincidence drives the plot, but a reliance on outdated notions of gender expectations is what makes this neonoir such an infuriating experience.tweet
I’m “biast” (pro): love Michael Shannon and Imogen Poots
I’m “biast” (con): nothing
(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)

Is she in pain? Or is she a lying, conniving bitch? Her state of mind only matters to the degree to which it makes a man have feels, so, you know, *blergh.* Frank & Lola, the first feature from writer-director Matthew Ross, makes it a matter of suspense just what the heck is going on with Lola (Imogen Poots: Green Room) when it comes to her relationship with Frank (Michael Shannon: Midnight Special): the movie never calls into question his violent jealousy, merely examines how justified he is in it. (Perhaps someone should have suggested to him that, at 15 years his junior, she is simply too young to make a good partner for him.) Ridiculous coincidence drives the plot:tweet the fact that Shannon is a hot restaurant chef is meant to justify getting him from Las Vegas to Paris at the drop of a hat, for one; later, Frank is suddenly an expert in forging handwriting. But it’s the film’s reliance on outdated notions of gender expectations and terrible ideas about the realities of women’s lives that make it such an infuriating experience. (It never seems to occur to Frank, never mind Ross, that a woman who has once had consensual sex with a man can also be raped by him.) Ross — who previously made a short entitled “Inspired by Bret Easton Ellis,” which could well be the title of this one, too, with its casual misogyny layered over emotional immaturitytweet — wants this to be a neonoir sorta-thriller that creates tension around the supposed indistinguishability of a woman suffering and a woman manipulating. Really? These things look the same? Ugh.

share and enjoy
             
If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, please reconsider.
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll measure. If you’re not a spammer or a troll, your comment will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately.
subscribe
notify of
8 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
RogerBW
RogerBW
Thu, Dec 08, 2016 1:19pm

“Huh. Women. Who can understand them?”
“Have you tried having a conversation with one?”

Dent
Dent
Thu, Dec 08, 2016 11:40pm

That’s noir for you. Misogyny is a genera trope. Some are definitly worth subverting these days, casual sexism should be at the top of the list.

RogerBW
RogerBW
reply to  Dent
Fri, Dec 09, 2016 10:56am

There’s nothing in noir that requires misogyny. Sure, most women in noir are wrong ‘uns, but so are most men.

Dent
Dent
reply to  RogerBW
Fri, Dec 09, 2016 2:08pm

Oh certainly, I’m simply speaking of classic examples of the genera.

Mike Emmet
Wed, Mar 08, 2017 1:19am

Clearly the reviewer is bringing their “battle of the sexes” biases to this film. I’m not saying that it’s a great film, but Ms. Johnson has missed some obvious things, due, I suspect, to bias. First of all, and most obviously, Frank, who is presented as the stereotypical “good guy” who beats up misogynists, violently rapes Lola when he thinks that she is lying to him. This is presented as the obvious reason that she won’t take him back at the end. She knows that he is no different that Alan. Obviously the viewer is not meant to think that Frank would never consider the possibility that a woman can be raped by a man she has had consensual sex with, given that he is clearly one of those men.

This is basically a film about bad people being bad, and no one comes out smelling of roses, no one is justified or just. It’s not about men vs women; that is something you brought to the film yourself.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Mike Emmet
Mon, Mar 13, 2017 6:14pm

Hmm. So, I bring my own baggage into a movie, but you don’t? Interesting…

but Ms. Johnson has missed some obvious things

LOL. Ironic.

Mike Emmet
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Wed, Mar 15, 2017 3:00pm

Oh please, straw men are a waste of time. I didn’t say “your own baggage”, I referred to a specific bias, and no, I don’t harbour that particular bias. If you have an actual response to the point I made regarding how I think that particular bias caused you to miss a very obvious plot point and its implications, or any actual counter argument at all, then by all means I’m interested in discussing it further. I really have no response to “LOL ironic”…

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Mike Emmet
Fri, Mar 17, 2017 7:33pm

You’re so cute.