47 Meters Down movie review: jumping the shark

Get new reviews in your email in-box or in an app by becoming a paid Substack subscriber or Patreon patron.

47 Meters Down yellow light

MaryAnn’s quick take…

Originally slated for a VOD release, and it feels like it: the few moments of simple tension quickly dissipate in the murky and not very shark-infested depths.tweet
I’m “biast” (pro): I’m desperate for movies about women
I’m “biast” (con): nothing
(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)

Though it seems the obvious explanation for its existence, 47 Meters Down is not, in fact, a cheaply assembled response to the success of last summer’s terrific Blake Lively-versus-shark thriller The Shallows. Instead, a movie that was completed and slated for a straight-to-VOD last August morphed into a theatrical release… very likely in response to the success of The Shallows. Be not fooled, though: there may be double the number of women in jeopardy in 47 but much less than half the amount of shark or suspense. On vacay in Mexico, American Lisa (Mandy Moore: Swinging with the Finkels) lets her sister, Kate (Claire Holt), talk her into cage diving to swim with sharks, as a way to show Lisa’s ex-boyfriend, who just dumped her, that she’s not “boring,” which might make him jealous, and maybe she’d even be able to win him back. These are not good motivations for such an endeavor, and indeed, luck is not with the women: the winch holding the cage just underwater snaps off its rickety boat and causes them — in the cage — to plummet to the ocean floor, where they are surrounded by sharks (apparently; we barely see them) and increasingly low on air. How o how will they be rescued? Director Johannes Roberts (Storage 24) manages to whip up a few moments of simple tension, but far more of it involves that impending emptying of scuba tanks than anything to do with toothy prehistoric ocean monsters, which we had been promised would be the big baddies. Even when a shark or two makes an appearance, we often cannot see what is happening, and that little bit of terror quickly dissipates in the murky depths.



share and enjoy
             
If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, please reconsider.
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll measure. If you’re not a spammer or a troll, your comment will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately.
subscribe
notify of
17 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
Owen1120
Owen1120
Sat, Jun 17, 2017 9:15pm

What was your opinion on the end? I read an article about it, and it appeared to be very divisive.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Owen1120
Thu, Jun 22, 2017 2:50pm

Cheap and cheaty.

RogerBW
RogerBW
Sat, Jun 17, 2017 10:20pm

From a scuba-diving point of view, at 47 metres you’ll probably be seriously narced (which makes normal people behave more like people in films), but most crucially the air tank which would have lasted you an hour for a normal 60-foot dive will be empty in 20-30 minutes – and that’s assuming you don’t breathe any faster, which these inexperienced divers probably will be doing. Also when you do that emergency ascent you’ll give yourself serious decompression sickness.

I have no idea how much of this is in the film, but since the trailer didn’t show any character development other than “is pretty and female” I had to think about something.

Owen1120
Owen1120
reply to  RogerBW
Sun, Jun 18, 2017 12:15am

A huge amount of that is in the film- can I spoil the ending for you?

RogerBW
RogerBW
reply to  Owen1120
Sun, Jun 18, 2017 8:02am

I don’t mind. The usual approach here is to use the Disqus spoiler tags.

Danielm80
Danielm80
reply to  RogerBW
Sun, Jun 18, 2017 12:55pm

It might also be a good idea to write “SPOILERS,” because, for some reason, the hidden text remains visible on the “Latest Comments” page. In this case, I don’t mind being spoiled, since there’s no chance I’m going to see the movie, but other people may feel differently.

Owen1120
Owen1120
reply to  RogerBW
Sun, Jun 18, 2017 1:55pm

SPOILERS

The captain does have to refill their oxygen tanks right before they are going to die because he is worried about “nitrogen narcosis,” which are hallucinations/unusual cognitive behavior. He encourages the women to watch out for each other. Then, one of the women has a mild hallucination, but she catches herself and realizes what’s happening. The film ends with them swimming to the surface, warding off sharks, going slow enough to avoid decompression sickness, and more- eventually, they both make it to the surface.

Until it is revealed that one of them hallucinated the whole thing and one of them is back in the cage again (the other one was already eaten).

Until I see the movie, I don’t know if it’s regarded as a bold twist or a lazy cop-out (how could someone hallucinate movie-style jump scares and action scenes?)

Bluejay
Bluejay
reply to  Owen1120
Sun, Jun 18, 2017 5:45pm

SPOILERS

Until it is revealed that one of them hallucinated the whole thing and one of them is back in the cage again (the other one was already eaten).

Really? Wow. That seems lame as hell. I hate it when the whole movie is basically saying “Psyche!” to the viewer.

Plot summary: “Character hallucinates entire movie.” Sounds like a cop-out to me, particularly if the reveal doesn’t shed any new light or add any new meaning to the actual situation.

Owen1120
Owen1120
reply to  Bluejay
Sun, Jun 18, 2017 6:22pm

The first hour of the movie still happened- she only hallucinated the action finale. What if in “The Wizard of Oz” there was a scene before the tornado where Dorothy talked about her frequent hallucinations for five minutes?

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Owen1120
Thu, Jun 22, 2017 2:56pm

*The Wizard of Oz* has a lot more substance to it than this movie does. *Oz* doesn’t feel like a cheat. This movie does.

Danielm80
Danielm80
reply to  Owen1120
Sun, Jun 18, 2017 6:03pm

Maybe I’ll go see Incident at Owl Creek Bridge again.

Tonio Kruger
reply to  Danielm80
Sun, Jun 18, 2017 8:51pm

I was going to go do that last night but then I woke up and realized it was all a dream…

Tonio Kruger
reply to  Danielm80
Sat, Jun 24, 2017 4:15am

For what it’s worth, I knew what you meant the first time. But it’s good that you caught your own error and corrected it. Besides, we all have moments in which it’s fairly obvious that what we meant to write was not the same thing as what we actually wrote.

RogerBW
RogerBW
reply to  Owen1120
Sun, Jun 18, 2017 6:28pm

OK, I wasn’t planning to see this anyway, but I’m really not now.

I won’t say hallucinations are impossible at that depth, but they’re certainly pretty unlikely. Much more usual would be “happy drunk”, bad choices and fixed ideas, but motor functions still working fairly normally.
(I do hope they didn’t say “oxygen tanks” because then they’d be dying of oxygen toxicity instead.)

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Owen1120
Thu, Jun 22, 2017 2:51pm

You know how the film ends but you haven’t seen it yet? Why? How?

Owen1120
Owen1120
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Thu, Jun 22, 2017 6:16pm

I mentioned earlier that I read an article (the A.V. Club review) that had mentioned the lazy twist. Then, there was a link to a separate page with a spoiler warning on it, where I read the end. Because the end seemed like a lazy cop-out to me, and you had not mentioned it, I wondered what you thought of it.

Hilda
Hilda
reply to  RogerBW
Wed, Jun 21, 2017 9:05pm

If just looking at the trailer is not fun, I found them full stream here [ SQUAD.LIGHT-MOVIE.US ]

And you can also download them, so you just copy & paste the bold text in new tab