Breaking In movie review: setting her house in order

Get new reviews in your email in-box or in an app by becoming a paid Substack subscriber or Patreon patron.

Breaking In yellow light

MaryAnn’s quick take…

This perfunctory home-invasion flick can’t whip up much suspense, and it strains for a feminism that it doesn’t know how to engage. But Gabrielle Union’s movie-star charisma shines through.tweet
I’m “biast” (pro): love Gabrielle Union
I’m “biast” (con): nothing
(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)
women’s participation in this film
male director, male screenwriter, female protagonist
(learn more about this)

The home invasion in coming from inside the house! Shaun (Gabrielle Union: Top Five) takes her kids — teen Jasmine (Ajiona Alexus) and preteen Glover (Seth Carr: Black Panther) — to her family’s Wisconsin lakeside estate for the weekend, to prepare it for sale after the death of her “prominent Chicago businessman” father. The trouble is, bad guys led by Eddie (Billy Burke: The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 2) got there first: they’re already in the rambling manse, searching for a hidden safe that, they believe, contains Dad’s secret stash of $4 million in cash. Because of shenanigans, Shaun gets locked out while Eddie and Co. hold the kids hostage, hoping to trade them for the location of the safe. There’s an intercom with which Shaun and Eddie can communicate, you see, as well as massively paranoid security features that make it really, really difficult for her to get back in.

The script, by Ryan Engle (The Commuter), finds a new way to deal with the eternal question of “Why don’t they just call for help?” and it’s one that isn’t about a remote location with no cell service. But that’s about the extent of Breaking In’s cleverness. Director James McTeigue (Survivor) — who clearly is never going to make another movie as good as his first, V for Vendetta — can’t manage to whip up much suspense from the underwritten action and perfunctory dialogue, which strains for a go-girl, enraged-mama-bear feminism but doesn’t know how to fully engage it. Still, Union’s movie-star charisma shines through, and she handles the robust physicality of adrenaline-fueled anger in a cheerworthy way. Let’s consider this a dry run for the sleek suave spy thriller she surely must be destined for.

Apple News
Read this review and other select content from Flick Filosopheron the News app from Apple.

share and enjoy
If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, please reconsider.
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll measure. If you’re not a spammer or a troll, your comment will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately.
notify of
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
Matt Clayton
Matt Clayton
Sun, May 13, 2018 5:32am

Let’s consider this a dry run for the sleek suave spy thriller she surely must be destined for.

I don’t know why Jessica Chastain couldn’t add Union to that 355 spy movie she’s doing with Marion Cotillard, Fan Bingbing, Lupita Nyong’o, and Penelope Cruz. There’s certainly room for at least 1-2 more actresses, I would think.

Tue, May 15, 2018 3:02pm

And I guess it’s not “because she’s black, the criminals are white, so if the police turn up they’ll probably just shoot her and go away again”. Rather too many shades of “chicks like this stuff, we’ll put it in” without asking any actual women…

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  RogerBW
Tue, May 15, 2018 4:37pm

if the police turn up they’ll probably just shoot her and go away again

I had a very similar thought about the possible ending of this movie. (Nothing like that happens. If it had, it could have elevated this to the *Get Out* realm.)