more by MaryAnn

relevant to your interests | by maryann johanson

Facebook
Twitter
Google+
Amazon author
tumblr
Pinterest
RSS

Jack the Giant Slayer (review)

Jack the Giant Slayer yellow light Ewan McGregor Eleanor Tomlinson Nicholas Hoult

I’m “biast” (pro): the cast and director Bryan Singer gave me some hope

I’m “biast” (con): getting tired of “reimagined” fairy tales

(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)


Monks doing dark magic? Like, apparently proper Christian monks? Does Jack the Giant Slayer really open with a flashbacky introduction about how Christian monks — who appear to worship the Christian God and believe in Heaven as a real place — used a horrifically and literally visceral sorcery to create an enchanted crown that could be used to control and rule actual giants who live in the space between Heaven and Earth?

That’s some pretty blasphemous stuff, if you believe in that sort of thing, and it’s pretty edgy and even approaching dangerous for a big-budget fantasy movie. (Note that Harry Potter, for instance, exists in a world that is as secular as its British setting and makes no mention at all of any religious or churchy stuff… and fundamentalists still get upset about it.) And that, alas, is the extent of the risks that Jack the Giant Slayer takes. If I didn’t know better about how films are made, I’d wonder if someone took a look at that opening sequence, realized how incendiary it could potentially be, and chickened out for the rest of the flick, ensured that everything that followed would be as ironed flat as possible, lest anyone be offended or horrified or just plain moved in any way whatsoever.

It could almost be funny, how Jack keeps trying to fly off into could-be fascinating directions and then gets yanked back into a mushy mediocrity. That opening hints at a Lord of the Rings style epicness — we’re clearly meant to see that magic crown as akin to the One Ring — but there’s never enough heft for that. (Which is ironic, given the physical size of the giants.) There’s no sweep to the kingdom in which farmboy Jack (Nicholas Hoult: Warm Bodies, X-Men: First Class) lives, and depressingly little sense of an authentic, living world — the entirety of this realm appears to consist of one walled city with a castle at its center… and the lone farm outside the walls on which Jack and his uncle live. (Oddly, the uncle disappears and is completely forgotten about early on.) Ewan McGregor (The Impossible, Salmon Fishing in the Yemen) and Stanley Tucci (Gambit, The Hunger Games) as, respectively, the king’s most trusted soldier, Elmont, and advisor, Roderick, keep edging into snarky Princess Bride territory — I’d love to see the movie they thought they were in; they’re the best reasons to see this — while everyone else is so tediously solemn. As the king, Ian McShane (Snow White and the Huntsman, Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides), poor sod, appears to believe he landed a guest spot on Game of Thrones, which is at odds with most of the rest of the film… though not the brief moments of very grim and disturbing horror: the giants really do like to eat people. But director Bryan Singer (Valkyrie, Superman Returns) cuts those short, too, and tosses in some kiddie-friendly giant farts and boogers as if to prove that he really and truly wants this to be a movie that will fail to fully satisfy all audiences.

Singer has reteamed with this frequent screenwriter Christopher McQuarrie (Jack Reacher, The Tourist) (cowriting with Darren Lemke [Shrek Forever After] and Dan Studney), and it would seem that they have no interest in making a movie as fresh as their The Usual Suspects again. Because they’ve resorted to the hoariest — and most tiresome — trope to kickstart their plot: a damsel in distress. It’s almost cruel how they do this, too: they posit a princess, Isabelle (Eleanor Tomlinson: Alice in Wonderland, The Illusionist), who’s tired of life in the castle… and “reward” her for setting off on her own little adventure by getting her caught up in the magic beanstalk that climbs toward the realm of the giants in the sky, and then flung in a cage by the giants to await rescue.

Jack had dreamed of adventure, too. And of course he actually gets it, when he accompanies Elmont and Roderick up the stalk to confront the giants. We in the audience are treated about as well as Isabelle, adventure and excitement dangled before us, only to be pulled back and held just beyond our reach.

UK
DVD/streaming

Amazon UK DVD
US/Canada release date: Mar 1 2013 | UK release date: Mar 22 2013

Flick Filosopher Real Rating: rated NFB: not full of beans
MPAA: rated PG-13 for intense scenes of fantasy action violence, some frightening images and brief language
BBFC: rated 12A (contains moderate fantasy violence and threat)

viewed in 3D
viewed at a semipublic screening with an audience of critics and ordinary moviegoers

official site | IMDb | trailer
more reviews: Movie Review Query Engine | Rotten Tomatoes
  • Danielm80

    “Keeps trying to fly off into potentially fascinating directions and then getting yanked back into mushy mediocrity…” sounds like a description of western civilization–especially after the Onion article you posted earlier in the week.

  • http://www.flickfilosopher.com/ MaryAnn Johanson

    Oh, now I *really* wanna cry…

  • CB

    I’m honestly surprised that this film is mediocre and had moments of promise, subsequently unrealized. Much more than I expected.

    On another note, for any screenwriters who happen to be searching the internet for advice from anonymous forum goers: Look, I understand you want the male hero to rescue the princess, I get that. That doesn’t mean the princess has to be useless! She can do stuff on her own, and yet still need saving by the hero at some point so she has a reason to swoon! It’d be nice if that point doesn’t mark the last time she doesn’t anything useful, though.

    Just a thought!

  • Dr. Rocketscience

    Re: Ewan MacGregor and Stanley Tucci – I felt the same watching this, especially with MacGregor. I kept thinking, “Wow, with that hair and that costume and the swashbuckling and the diction and the whole Errol Flynn thing – he’s rocking this part like he’s in a real movie.”

  • RogerBW

    Yup – this is about the most positive response I’ve seen to the film so far. While the usual story seems to be “we had a clever script, but the studio messed it up”, I start to wonder whether in this case if the little bits of clever were all that could be worked into an utterly generic template.

  • AA

    I still want to see this, but will wait for Netflix.

    And someday I hope that the writer’s guild will reward a young heroine sneaking out for adventure with more adventure that she gets to build on.

    Related peeve: It still frustrates me when people joke at my birthday that I’m 29. No, I’m almost 40 and I do what I do, because I earned it! Dammit!

  • Froborr

    Monks doing magic isn’t that farfetched. Most of the medieval and Renaissance occultists–John Dee, Isaac Newton, pretty much all the alchemists–were very religious and many were actually priests or monks.
    And as for Harry Potter, yes, it’s secular on the surface, but you don’t need to scratch very far below that at all to realize it’s as Protestant as Lord of the Rings is Catholic. But that just makes the fundie freakout all the funnier.
    As for this movie… so it’s exactly what I expected from the trailer. It’s sad, because there’s some really good things you could do with subverted fairy tales–I’d love a good animated version of The Enchanted Forest Chronicles, for instance.
    Oh, and thanks for your Star Trek: Into Darkness review. It convinced me to use my thanks-for-spending-so-much-money-here “free” ticket on it, and while it probably wasn’t worth the full $15 for a ticket, it was definitely better than I expected. (Iron Man 3 is still the better “we need to get over 9/11 and move on” film, though.)

  • Seraphina

    In the deleted scenes on the DVD, there was said, that the prologue took place in the year 310.
    Well, there were no christian monks in Albion (which is a celtic name for England), in fact there were absolutely no christians at that early period. Christians were still a bunch of sects in the Mediterranean area
    Therefore, they should have turned the monks into druids.
    Besides … druids using magic is not so creepy as monks doing it.