Plastic review: movie declined

Get new reviews in your email in-box or in an app by becoming a paid Substack subscriber or Patreon patron.

Plastic red light

Preposterous and charmless, this heist flick purports to be based on a true story and hopes to invoke a Robin Hood vibe, but I’m not buying any of it.
I’m “biast” (pro): nothing

I’m “biast” (con): nothing

(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)

A gang of London university students graduate from local credit card fraud to a $20 million diamond heist in Miami when they piss off a crime lord and have two weeks to pay him restitution. The preposterous Plastic purports to be based on a true story, but good luck trying to find out what those actual events were. They cannot possibly be the nonsense we see depicted here. Such as when fraudster chief Sam (Ed Speleers: Eragon) easily recruits the gang’s Smurfette, Frankie (Emma Rigby: Endless Love), whose pants he’s trying to get in to and who also just so happens to work for a credit-card processing company. (Sure, a college student in a part-time job would have access to precisely the sort of sensitive information about high spenders that makes an identity thief’s job a snap.) Later, Frankie graduates to damsel in distress when the crime lord (Thomas Kretschmann: Stalingrad) gets extra angry. The heist finale is egregiously implausible, relying as it does on a diamond exec being fooled by the gang in some bad wigs and phony accents into behaving in the stupidest ways possible. The film is probably meant to coast on the alleged charm of the gang — which also includes Will Poulter (We’re the Millers), Alfie Allen (Game of Thrones), and Sebastian De Souza — but they’re a bunch of sociopaths, with Sam the worst of them, and deeply unpleasant to spend time with. The script, by director Julian Gilbey with Will Gilbey and Chris Howard, tries to convince us they’re all merely Robin Hoods stealing from the insurance companies that will cover their crimes for the victims, crimes they’re forced into because there’s no way any of them will ever end up with decent jobs in this lousy economy. But I’m not buying it. Not even with a stolen card whose bill will never get to me.

share and enjoy
If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, please reconsider.
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll measure. If you’re not a spammer or a troll, your comment will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately.
notify of
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
Sun, May 04, 2014 7:59pm

The Film was great Brilliant 5 stars

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Pamela
Sun, May 04, 2014 10:21pm

It what way was it brilliant? What do you give it five stars for? Otherwise we’re going to take you for a studio shill or Ed Speelers’ mom.

reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Mon, May 05, 2014 6:57pm

are you sure it’s not a spambot?

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  bronxbee
Mon, May 05, 2014 7:07pm

No, I’m not.

Mon, May 05, 2014 8:29pm

Ya gotta make me care. If the story is nasty people doing nasty things to other nasty people, where’s the involvement? Scriptwriters and directors need, I think, to remember that not everyone is as totally in love with their characters as they are.

Sat, Aug 02, 2014 7:36pm

iv been trying 2 find this film and cant find anywere plz help

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  steven
Sat, Aug 02, 2014 9:36pm

It’s gone from UK cinemas but will be on Region 2 DVD on September 8th.

Thu, Aug 28, 2014 2:20am

Its part based on events that went down in 2007 and involved 5 people in the biggest credit card fraud in the history of Britain. Although the film does not account for the precise events but like I said its part based . I would say 50 to 60%. The film has the razzle dazzle and all the glittering the director could add on to it to make it bearable for the audience. Peace

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  RicM91
Thu, Aug 28, 2014 9:08am

Is “loosely based on a true story” meant to be a defense of the film? If so, it’s not working.