It’s so very tempting to say that Liam Neeson’s recent comments — about wanting to kill a random black man as punishment for a crime committed by another, different, unknown black man — have cast a pall over his latest revenge fantasy, Cold Pursuit. (Neeson shared this story by way of explaining, in the course of promoting this very movie, why he understands the appeal of revenge fantasies, thereby illustrating that he understands neither revenge nor public relations.) But it would be difficult for there to be a greater pall over Cold Pursuit than the one this infuriatingly unwatchable movie casts over itself.
For this is a racist, sexist movie that appears to insist on the absolute necessity of its racism and sexism: it’s here, stubbornly, even though there’s no justification for it. Excising all the random racist, sexist crap padding out this rancid excuse for a thriller might have gotten the film down to the sort of 87-minute runtime that garbage that like this warrants (if it warrants any existence at all).

And yet that still wouldn’t help with a more fundamental problem with the movie: that it makes no sense whatsoever.
Nels Coxman (Neeson: Widows, The Commuter) drives a snow plow in and around the (fictional) Rocky Mountain ski-resort town of Kehoe, where he has just been named “Citizen of the Year,” presumably because no one else could possibly manage a snow plow like he does. Of course this is meant to be part of the movie’s grim, unfunny “humor,” because would any town’s Citizen of the Year go on a killing rampage, even in response to the death of his son? Kyle Coxman (Micheál Richardson [Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues], very briefly) is murdered by soldiers of drug lord Trevor “Viking” Calcote (Tom Bateman [Murder on the Orient Express], a rare English actor with a terrible American accent) because–
Well, we never know why. A suitcase full of Viking’s cocaine has gone missing, but Cold Pursuit never bothers to let us know what Kyle had to do with that, or even if he had anything to do with that. Maybe Viking and his guys made a mistake fingering the culprit? Maybe director Hans Petter Moland (A Conspiracy of Faith) — remaking his own 2014 Norwegian film Kraftidioten — is offering commentary on the pointlessness of revenge thrillers and the moviegoing audience’s obvious thirst for them? Like, does it even matter why Liam Neeson is going on another rage-fueled execution spree? But if so, why even bother with the son’s murder? Why not have the antihero fly into a vigilante fit over something really minor and petty? Maybe Viking left his fancy car purchased with drug money in the path of Coxman’s plow?
But there’s no indication that there’s any satire in the offing — no, not even the Oscar Wilde quote that bizarrely opens the movie. Even the few cheap callbacks to Fargo do nothing but suggest that filmmakers such as the Coen Brothers might have made this unpleasant mess palatable, or even genuinely entertaining. Moland cannot manage the tone, however, and the whole endeavor is thoroughly appalling. The extended riff about kidnapping is bad, though a better filmmaker might have pulled it off; the dragged-out sight gag about poor dead Kyle’s body in the morgue is completely abhorrent, because aren’t we meant to share Coxman’s outrage? Why are we invited to laugh at Kyle’s corpse and the horror of his shocked parents having to identify him?

Kyle’s mom, an utterly thankless role, is played by Laura Dern (Star Wars: The Last Jedi, Downsizing), who smartly gets the hell out of the movie as soon as she possibly can, before she can be humiliated the way that other women are here, like the shrill caricature of an Asian woman (Elizabeth Thai: X-Men Origins: Wolverine, Saved!), the wife of a retired drug runner, and Viking’s harridan of an ex (Julia Jones: The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 2, Jonah Hex). But why does Neeson disappear for a long stretch in the middle of the action? Moland gives us absolutely no reason to care about the turf war that Coxman stirs up between Viking and White Bull (Tom Jackson: Grizzly Falls), the rival Native American drug lord with whom Viking had an uneasy truce until the latter’s men started turning up dead. (We cannot even tell some of the members of these gangs apart, actually, they’re so indistinct and undeveloped.) The movie does zip with the Kehoe cop (Emmy Rossum: Comet, Before I Disappear) who is investigating the local shenanigans, except force her to contend with the sexist “banter” of her older colleague (John Doman: Ordinary World, Gracie).
Cold Pursuit is the sort of abomination that thinks it can get away with abuse and bigotry because it’s coming from characters who are not very nice or outright villains, such as Viking’s horrendous exchange with an African-American hitman (Arnold Pinnock: The Incredible Hulk, Lars and the Real Girl). That doesn’t excuse it or justify it. It’s all engineered by Moland and screenwriter Frank Baldwin, who maneuver their narrative pawns into positions where they can be abused as a sideshow to all the bloody violence. Perhaps they knew just how tedious the action stuff is, and thought to distract us? They failed at that, too.


















Stellan Skarsgård in what I’ve seen of Kraftidioten manages to portray the central character plausibly: this is an ordinary guy who has generally just tried to get along with people, who then snaps. But when a character is played by Liam Neeson you already know he’s going to go on a killing spree; it’s what he does. The challenge for him would be portraying the ordinary guy in the first place.
None of this helps with the rest of the film of course.
Johanson’s writing style and tiresome remarks casts a “pall” over her life.
Movie was great! Go see it, you’ll love it.
If you’re going to step in as a movie critic (and psychologist), you might want to explain why the film is worth watching, so we have some reason to trust your judgment, but you’re probably too much of an outlaw to do that.
This one’s kinda fascinating. His profile bio is the US Pledge of Allegiance, but his handle references “The Outlaw Josey Wales”, a pro-Confederacy story. Presumably the incongruity and irony of this is lost on him. Also, he’s a prolific Breitbart commenter, so… well.
How do you know I’ll love it?
He’s obviously a telepath, Bluejay. I should consider it a miracle that my nose isn’t bleeding. :-)
It really doesn’t.
I was telling my sister about various new films and mentioned the new Liam Neeson revenger called Cold Pursuit, which, on the flyer I picked up from my local cinema, has the world’s laziest tagline, “Revenge is Best Served Cold”. My sister thought I was joking, until I produced the flyer to prove it. She stared at it, laughing in disbelief. Neither of us plans to see it. We surmised we’d already derived more entertainment laughing at this A5 promotional poster than could be had from actually watching the movie.
You could also watch the “Mr Plow” episode of *The Simpsons* for better plow-related entertainment.
I’d like to put a Spanish version of your review on my next album:
Señor Coxman es muy macho,
Su pelicula es ridícula,
La venganza es mejor con queso fundido.
dios mio! eso es brilliante!
I suggest you read closer. Or, indeed, at all.
This review is 100% spot on. I just left the film and it’s AWFUL. It’s beyond misguided and unfunny. Not a single scene works or made sense. It will definitely be on my worst of the year — if not THE worst. And this is coming from someone who sat through Serenity last week!
Another angry American hating liberal!
If you think that hating racism and sexism is the same as hating Americans, maybe that says something about America.
Actually that says a lot more about him. Unless you think I’m justified in believing that every American who posts here — including MaryAnn — is a racist and a sexist. If I honestly believed that, I would not come here.
Really? #NotAllAmericans?
Really? Emphasizing collective guilt over individual guilt? In a world where all too many people would hate both of us because of our ethnic backgrounds?
I understand the point you’re trying to make but I don’t always consider it to be all that helpful.
So… you’re saying a lot of Americans are racist. You’re kind of making Danielm80’s point.
I probably should resist the temptation to answer after all this time but in the words of former online debate opponent Catherine Catherini, I gotta be me…
That said:
Not really. America is hardly the only place where residents badmouth Jews and Mexicans and just because a lot of Americans are racist doesn’t mean that all Americans are racist. (And before you bring up the #NotAll argument again, it should be noted that many of the first arguments I heard in defense of blacks, women and gays were variations on the classic #NotAll argument. History indeed has a cynical sense of humor.)
I’m not blind to the harsher side of America’s past — if anything, I’m more aware of it than most people. But I still don’t find Danielm80’s point all that helpful if for no other reason that it emphasizes the principle of collective guilt. And collective guilt has not been kind to minority groups in this country.
No one said that it was.
Danielm80 was replying sarcastically to a troll and turning his argument back on him. MaryAnn is, as Danielm80 well knows, American; and if she and other Americans are criticizing racism, then obviously not all Americans are racist. But far too many of us are, as I’m sure you and Danielm80 agree on. It’s why we have the “leader” we have today, and why consequently hundreds of thousands of us will die before this crisis passes. (And while not all of us are openly or blatantly racist, we’re all products of a racist system and our attitudes and actions, consciously or not, are influenced by that system to varying degrees. But that’s another discussion.)
Like many arguments, the notion of collective guilt depends on context and the dynamics of power. To say, for instance, “all Asian individuals are guilty of causing the coronavirus” is not the same AT ALL as saying, for instance, “all non-indigenous Americans are guilty of benefiting, whether they like it or not, from a society built unjustly on the stolen land and spilled blood of its original inhabitants.” The first statement is an evil falsehood justifying violence against innocents. The second statement is true, with the aim of making those of us higher up the ladder of privilege and power reflect on how we’re complicit with the system and how we can push for change.
Almost every bad guy was a white male, but go ahead and go full #SJW because non-whites and females weren’t treated like gods.
FYI, folks, this is the kind of comment that gets you banned. For sheer, pointless, bigoted idiocy that not only adds nothing to the conversation, but threatens to derail it.
Don’t be like Jonas.
Translation required.